Mathematics has been called the language of the universe.

Scientists and engineers often speak of the elegance of mathematics when describing physical reality, citing examples such as π, E=mc2, and even something as simple as using abstract integers to count realworld objects. Yet while these examples demonstrate how useful math can be for us, does it mean that the physical world naturally follows the rules of mathematics as its "mother tongue," and that this mathematics has its own existence that is out there waiting to be discovered? This point of view on the nature of the relationship between mathematics and the physical world is called Platonism, but not everyone agrees with it.
Derek Abbott, Professor of Electrical and Electronics Engineering at The University of Adelaide in Australia, has written a perspective piece to be published in the Proceedings of the IEEE in which he argues that mathematical Platonism is an inaccurate view of reality. Instead, he argues for the opposing viewpoint, the nonPlatonist notion that mathematics is a product of the human imagination that we tailor to describe reality.
This argument is not new. In fact, Abbott estimates (through his own experiences, in an admittedly nonscientific survey) that while 80% of mathematicians lean toward a Platonist view, engineers by and large are nonPlatonist. Physicists tend to be "closeted nonPlatonists," he says, meaning they often appear Platonist in public. But when pressed in private, he says he can "often extract a nonPlatonist confession."
Via Wildcat2030