Earth Alert
8 views | +0 today
Follow
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Invisible Gardener from Organic Farming
Scoop.it!

Mycorrhizae For Sale - The Most Helpful Soil Inoculant

Mycorrhizae For Sale - The Most Helpful Soil Inoculant | Earth Alert | Scoop.it
I have mycorrhizae for sale, but really, ‘mycorrhizae’ refers to the relationship between the fungi and the root (‘myco’ is fungi and ‘rhiza’ is root).

Via Giri Kumar
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Invisible Gardener from Organic Farming
Scoop.it!

#OurResponsibility

#OurResponsibility | Earth Alert | Scoop.it
April is #EarthMonth! Here's putting what might go in the trash to good use. #Composting #SproutsFarmersMarket (Interested in #composting but not sure where to begin?

Via Giri Kumar
Invisible Gardener's insight:

Yes

more...
Brenda J. Rankin's curator insight, June 22, 2014 5:57 PM

Good dirt is the secret to growing garden vegetables. Know what to compost .

 

 

 

 

Rescooped by Invisible Gardener from Organic Farming
Scoop.it!

9 Habits of a Great Farmer - Organic Farming - Sustainable Agriculture - Growers Trust - Growers Trust

9 Habits of a Great Farmer - Organic Farming - Sustainable Agriculture - Growers Trust - Growers Trust | Earth Alert | Scoop.it

Farming land is no easy task. For serious growers and farmers, doing so successfully requires time, money, and a ton of effort to ensure that the farm’s harvests and plentiful and growing. In reality, the majority of farmers depend on their crops to pay their bills and keep the farms sustainable and thriving. When one aspect of the harvest fails, it is up to the farmer to create a quick and effective solution to keep the farm operating the way it should be. Organic farming methods are calculated procedures that depend upon the natural biological processes to keep farms healthy. With a mix of modern technology, the right fertilizers, and traditional farming practices, maintaining a successful farm is a real possibility. It is important, however, to remember that farming practices quickly become habits.

The best farmers throughout the world make it a point to perfect their daily habits and turn them into a thriving agriculture business. The following are the top 9 habits of a great farmer:

Staying focused on revenues to ensure that cost management is stable. Stick to budgets and cover all costs of production.Remain disciplined and resolute in keeping the harvests thriving and asking for help when help is needed.Enjoy the work. A man who has fun while farming will never work a day in his life.Learn from your farming errors and make note to not make these mistakes again.Coordinate action plans for all types of “what-if” scenarios. This leaves little room for error when an unexpected storm approaches or a certain crop is producing at optimal rates.Look at your competition and compare how your harvests stack up. Using benchmarks is an excellent way to keep improving production.Be prideful and pay close attention to your reputation. People buy from the farms that they truly trust, keep that trust by building a solid foundation of good work.Sell locally. Not only does this reduce pollution, but it is an amazing way to get involved and enrich your community.Get on board with solar and wind energy now. Alternative energy is here to stay. Farms who utilize this now will be setting themselves up for big wins in the future.

Every farmer has their own unique style. Sustainable agriculture is founded by the habits that these farmers create for their farms. Make an honest effort to be the best farmer that you can be and always remember where you came from. The best farmers have the best habits. When it comes to life on the farm, make every day count.X


Via Giri Kumar
more...
Rescooped by Invisible Gardener from Organic Farming
Scoop.it!

Insecticides put world food supplies at risk - HortiBiz

Insecticides put world food supplies at risk - HortiBiz | Earth Alert | Scoop.it

The world’s most widely used insecticides have contaminated the environment across the planet so pervasively that global food production is at risk, according to a comprehensive scientific assessment of the chemicals’ impacts.

The researchers compare their impact with that reported in Silent Spring, the landmark 1962 book by Rachel Carson that revealed the decimation of birds and insects by the blanket use of DDT and other pesticides and led to the modern environmental movement.

Billions of dollars’ worth of the potent and long-lasting neurotoxins are sold every year but regulations have failed to prevent the poisoning of almost all habitats, the international team of scientists concluded in the most detailed study yet. As a result, they say, creatures essential to global food production – from bees to earthworms – are likely to be suffering grave harm and the chemicals must be phased out.

The new assessment analysed the risks associated with neonicotinoids, a class of insecticides on which farmers spend $2.6bn (£1.53bn) a year. Neonicotinoids are applied routinely rather than in response to pest attacks but the scientists highlight the “striking” lack of evidence that this leads to increased crop yields.

“The evidence is very clear. We are witnessing a threat to the productivity of our natural and farmed environment equivalent to that posed by organophosphates or DDT,” said Jean-Marc Bonmatin, of the National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) in France, one of the 29 international researchers who conducted the four-year assessment. “Far from protecting food production, the use of neonicotinoid insecticides is threatening the very infrastructure which enables it.” He said the chemicals imperilled food supplies by harming bees and other pollinators, which fertilise about three-quarters of the world’s crops, and the organisms that create the healthy soils which the world’s food requires in order to grow.

Professor Dave Goulson, at the University of Sussex, another member of the team, said: “It is astonishing we have learned so little. After Silent Spring revealed the unfortunate side-effects of those chemicals, there was a big backlash. But we seem to have gone back to exactly what we were doing in the 1950s. It is just history repeating itself. The pervasive nature of these chemicals mean they are found everywhere now.

“If all our soils are toxic, that should really worry us, as soil is crucial to food production."

The assessment, published on Tuesday, cites the chemicals as a key factor in the decline of bees, alongside the loss of flower-rich habitats meadows and disease. The insecticides harm bees’ ability to navigate and learn, damage their immune systems and cut colony growth. In worms, which provide a critical role in aerating soil, exposure to the chemicals affects their ability to tunnel.

Dragonflies, which eat mosquitoes, and other creatures that live in water are also suffering, with some studies showing that ditchwater has become so contaminated it could be used directly as a lice-control pesticide.

The report warned that loss of insects may be linked to major declines in the birds that feed on them, though it also notes that eating just a few insecticide-treated seeds would kill birds directly.

“Overall, a compelling body of evidence has accumulated that clearly demonstrates that the wide-scale use of these persistent, water-soluble chemicals is having widespread, chronic impacts upon global biodiversity and is likely to be having major negative effects on ecosystem services such as pollination that are vital to food security,” the study concluded.

The report is being published as a special issue of the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Science and Pollution Research and was funded by a charitable foundation run by the ethical bank Triodos.

The EU, opposed by the British government and the National Farmers Union, has already imposed a temporary three-year moratorium on the use of some neonicotinoids on some crops. This month US president Barack Obama ordered an urgent assessment of the impact of neonicotinoids on bees. But the insecticides are used all over the world on crops, as well as flea treatments in cats and dogs and to protect timber from termites.

However, the Crop Protection Association, which represents pesticide manufacturers, criticised the report. Nick von Westenholz, chief executive of the CPA, said: “It is a selective review of existing studies which highlighted worst-case scenarios, largely produced under laboratory conditions. As such, the publication does not represent a robust assessment of the safety of systemic pesticides under realistic conditions of use.”

Von Westenholz added: “Importantly, they have failed or neglected to look at the broad benefits provided by this technology and the fact that by maximising yields from land already under cultivation, more wild spaces are preserved for biodiversity. The crop protection industry takes its responsibility towards pollinators seriously. We recognise the vital role pollinators play in global food production.”

The new report, called the Worldwide Integrated Assessment on Systemic Pesticides, analysed every peer-reviewed scientific paper on neonicotinoids and another insecticide called fipronil since they were first used in the mid-1990s. These chemicals are different from other pesticides because, instead of being sprayed over crops, they are usually used to treat seeds. This means they are taken up by every part of the growing plant, including roots, leaves, pollen and nectar, providing multiple ways for other creatures to be exposed.

The scientists found that the use of the insecticides shows a “rapid increase” over the past decade and that the slow breakdown of the compounds and their ability to be washed off fields in water has led to “large-scale contamination”. The team states that current rules on use have failed to prevent dangerous levels building up in the environment.

Almost as concerning as what is known about neonicotinoids is what is not known, the researchers said. Most countries have no public data on the quantities or locations of the systemic pesticides being applied. The testing demanded by regulators to date has not determined the long-term effect of sub-lethal doses, nor has it assessed the impact of the combined impact of the cocktail of many pesticides encountered in most fields. The toxicity of neonicotinoids has only been established for very few of the species known to be exposed. For example, just four of the 25,000 known species of bee have been assessed. There is virtually no data on effects on reptiles or mammals.


Via Giri Kumar
more...
Eric Larson's curator insight, July 20, 2014 8:19 AM

Serious business.

Rescooped by Invisible Gardener from Organic Farming
Scoop.it!

Green Glossary Part 1: Definitions of farm-to-table food terms | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram

Green Glossary Part 1: Definitions of farm-to-table food terms  | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram | Earth Alert | Scoop.it

Here are a few words and phrases that will be regulars in this section, defined for you with the help of experts asked to pretend they were explaining them to their next-door neighbours.

NATURAL

“Natural” is a word that doesn’t really mean anything when you see it in the grocery store. It is little more than a marketing tool to entice you to buy one box of cereal or package of granola bars over another. Except for meat and poultry, no federal rules define the word. The USDA says those can only be labeled “natural” only if they are minimally processed and contain no artificial ingredients or added colors. The label must spell this out clearly to prevent confusion for consumers.

CAGE-FREE

This term generally refers to how egg-laying hens are treated. If you see the term on a package of chicken meat, it doesn’t mean anything because chickens raised for meat are never kept in cages. (Another marketing ploy is “no hormones added.” It’s illegal to give hormones to poultry.) Cage-free, which represents about 8 percent of the eggs produced in this country, doesn’t necessarily mean cruelty-free. But it does mean that the birds are not locked in cages, immobilized for their entire life. They are able to walk around inside of barns, but usually do not go outside. They can lay their eggs in nests, spread their wings and engage in other important natural behaviours.

“They’re not living on Old McDonald’s farm,” said Paul Shapiro, vice president of farm animal protection for the Humane Society of the United States. “If you were to go to a commercial cage-free operation, it’s still tens of thousands of birds who are indoors at all times. But compared to the sheer horror of battery cage confinement for egg-laying hens, it’s an improvement.”

FREE-RANGE

Free range means that a farm animal has some type of outdoor access, but is not necessarily being raised on pasture. There are no governmental guidelines for how much space each animal needs nor for the quality of the range. The term doesn’t even mean the animals actually go outside – merely that they can.

ORGANIC

Organic agriculture is an approach to farming that relies on biological systems, soil- enrichment and natural materials, says Mary Yurlina, director of MOFGA Certification Services LLC. Organic farmers rotate crops, apply compost, and use certain tillage techniques, for example, to produce healthy soils that feed their crops and keep weeds, pests and diseases under control. While organic farmers can use a narrow range of products to fight insects and diseases, these are used as a last resort. Genetically modified organisms, sewage sludge application, and ionizing radiation are strictly prohibited.

Organic livestock are fed certified organic feeds, pasture or browse, and are raised with ample access to the outdoors. No antibiotics or hormones are allowed, and only a limited range of carefully reviewed healthcare products may be administered when animals are sick. Also, farm practices may not harm natural resources and biodiversity. Organic producers must keep records to document that their practices meet the USDA’s National Organic Program (NOP) Rule, and they are verified annually with a farm plan review and on-site inspection.

SUSTAINABILITY

Sustainability has typically been described as a three-legged stool, the three legs being the environment, economics and social justice. All three legs have to remain in balance for the stool to remain standing. Stephen Mulkey, president of Unity College, defines sustainability as the “use of present resources in a way that does not compromise future generations.” We are far from that goal, he continued, and are, in fact, “eating into the capital of the planet in terms of our use of natural resources.” The central issue for sustainable agriculture? Climate change. Mulkey argues that Maine is way behind in anticipating and preparing for the changes that will be coming over the next decade or two. Farmers need to be thinking about what they’ll plant and how severe storms and floods will affect their land. Fishermen need to consider what they’ll do if the lobster population crashes.

“We’re way out of balance at this point,” Mulkey said. “Could we ever achieve sustainability? Not in a single generation. We can’t do it overnight. We’re talking a multi-generational banquet, essentially. You and I will set the table, and the next generation may cook the meal, and the generation after that may be able to sit down and eat it.”

LOCAVORE

It sounds like something that escaped from Jurassic Park. To people who are sick of hearing the word, it is just as scary. The word “locavore” was coined by four northern California women in 2005. They were, perhaps, the first to draw a 100-mile radius around their homes and declare that no food would pass their lips if it hadn’t originated within that “foodshed.” Two years later, the Oxford American Dictionary designated “locavore” the 2007 Word of the Year.

Eating like a locavore is considered a more sustainable way to live, and apparently Mainers are pretty good at it. Every year a Vermont-based local food advocacy group called “Strolling of the Heifers” releases a ranking of states according to their commitment to local foods. That commitment is measured with data such as the per capita number of farmers’ markets, CSAs and food hubs in each state. This year, Maine was No. 2 on the list, just after Vermont. A food hub, by the way, is a distribution and processing center that gives local farmers better access to retail, institutional and other markets.

TERROIR

The French came up with the concept of terroir as a way to describe how wine grapes in different regions, or even different vineyards, embody the landscape where they grow by expressing variations in flavor and other qualities. The idea is that everything that surrounds the vine, including the soil and climate, interacts with it to assert “a sense of place.” Is it growing in a mountainous region or in the flatlands? Is it exposed to saltwater from the ocean, or does it grow beside a freshwater stream? “Everyone knows there’s Cabernet Sauvignon, there’s Sauvignon Blanc, there’s Syrah,” said Chris Peterman of the Maine chapter of American Sommeliers. “But even though that same grape grows in all different parts of the world, it’s different in all parts of the world because of how it grows, where it grows and what’s around it.” Today, some Americans use terroir to describe many other foods, such as cheese, chocolate, coffee, tomatoes, oysters and wheat.

FARM-TO-TABLE

Farm-to-table is not a new phrase, but its definition has come to mean much more than the fact that the potato on your plate came from an Aroostook County field. “Farm-to-table describes a cuisine, a method by which food moves from its source to your mouth, and a movement,” says Colleen Hanlon-Smith, executive director of the Maine Federation of Farmers Markets. “Regardless of the context this phrase is used in, it implies that the person using it should know where their food is coming from, by name of farm, forest or fishery – ideally by first name of farmer, forager or fisherman.”

Many people think of farm-to-table as a modern ideal, but in researching the term we discovered a newspaper article from the early 20th century that used the phrase to describe an experiment by the U.S. Postal Service in which it delivered agricultural products – eggs, butter, vegetables, watermelons, even live poultry – from farms directly to consumers.

The experiment was not an unqualified success. “One of the striking features which has come to my attention in making this campaign to bring the producers and the consumers together is the fact that some farmers have been charging top prices for their products,” Boston postmaster E.C. Mansfield wrote in his report on the project. “It was assumed when the plan was first broached that the consumer would get the benefit of lower prices as a means of reducing the cost of living, and that the producer, by sending direct by parcel post, could afford to sell at rock bottom prices. This, however, has not proven, generally, to be so...”

CSA

If you’ve ever picked up a box of food at your local farm without knowing what’s inside, chances are you already know what CSA stands for: Community Supported Agriculture.

A CSA is an agreement between a farmer and a consumer in which the consumer pays for produce and other agricultural products up front, and in return gets a regular share of the harvest throughout the growing season. The farmer benefits by getting money early in the year to help pay for the costs of seeds and equipment before the harvest comes in.

As CSAs have grown in popularity – there are now more than 180 in Maine – some farms have tinkered with the traditional format. At Snell Family Farm in Bar Mills, the CSA has evolved into a more flexible, market-based model. Customers pay for a share and get a little extra money added to their account by the farm as an incentive to sign up. They can shop for their food at the Snell stand at the farmers’ market instead of getting a weekly “mystery basket” of vegetables, and it builds a face-to-face connection.

“We tend to know our CSA customers by name,” said Carolyn Snell. “They’re likely to know us by name and they feel like they’re part of the action. If they go on vacation, they don’t miss out. If they don’t like kohlrabi, they don’t get loaded up with it. But it’s not the same kind of adventure eating as a traditional CSA.”

For the farm, Snell says, having a CSA means more sustainable financing. Rather than take out big operating loans, the farm’s CSA memberships cover spring payroll and pay for seeds, pots and compost.

CSF

CSF stands for Community Supported Fishery, and Maine was the first place in the country to have one. A CSF supports local fisheries by allowing customers to pay up front for a share of the catch, whatever that may be from week to week.

“Basically all we did was hijack the idea from the farmers with the CSAs, where you buy a share of the crop at a set price and then you get a bag of vegetables every week,” said Glenn Libby, president of Port Clyde Fresh Catch in Tenants Harbor. “We started out doing that with shrimp.”

That was in 2007. Today the buy-direct concept has grown to include all kinds of seafood and different ways of delivering it. Instead of paying up front for a supply of seafood that’s a surprise every week, Libby’s customers now join an e-mail list and use an online shopping cart to order exactly what they want. Fresh Catch still delivers, but they also ship seafood by UPS. The CSF has also partnered with local farmers markets and local farm CSAs. Across the country, most CSFs are still following the original model set up in Maine seven years ago. According to localcatch.org, the idea has spread to 192 locations in the United States and Canada.

SLOW FOOD

In the public mind, slow food is simply the opposite of fast food. But it is really an organization whose name has come to define a global movement.

In 1986, an Italian journalist was outraged to discover that McDonald’s was about to open a restaurant next to the Spanish Steps in Piazza di Spagna, one of Rome’s most storied spots. Concerned that the encroaching fast food culture would threaten traditional Italian foodways, he organized a protest against the industrialization of food and “homogenized eating.” Instead of signs, the protesters carried bowls of handmade penne. Thus Slow Food, an organization that now has more than 1,300 local chapters and 100,000 members worldwide, was born.

Portland’s chapter is largely inactive except for partially funding Mainers who attend the biannual Slow Food Terra Madre international conference in Italy. But its members are still carrying out the goals of Slow Food through their dedication to preserving local food traditions and the biodiversity of species that provide us with food.

“We want to maintain the cultural and regional food traditions that have existed over centuries and evolved over centuries,” said Karl Schatz, owner of Ten Apple Farm in Gray and a leader of the Portland Slow Food convivium, “and we don’t want those traditions to be wiped out and replaced by the globalization of easy industrial food or things like McDonald’s or Pizza Hut.”

GMO-FREE

GMO stands for genetically modified organism, and it’s probably one of the most complicated and controversial topics in agriculture today. Farmers, scientists and consumers fiercely debate the safety and ethics of genetically altering our food supply, and state legislatures all over the country are considering bills that would require such products be clearly labeled. Last year, Maine became only the second state (after Connecticut) to pass a bill requiring GMO foods to be labeled. But the bill can’t take effect until four contiguous states pass similar laws.

GMO-free means that a food does not contain organisms whose genetic material has been altered through genetic engineering. In January, General Mills announced it had made Cheerios GMO-free (followed shortly after by Post Grape Nuts), but carrying the label hasn’t apparently made much difference in sales.

GRASS-FED

Grass-fed means the animal has not eaten any grains, ever, from weaning to harvest.

Grass-fed cows can graze on grain crops only if the plants haven’t developed a grain head yet, explains Ben Hartwell, who raises grass-fed beef at Sebago Lake Ranch in Gorham. That means the beef in the grocery store labeled “grass-fed, grain-finished” by definition isn’t grass-fed beef, at least not according to the USDA. Most cattle headed for market eat grass until they are sent to the feedlots to be put on grain and gain weight fast. Hartwell’s animals eat grass from May through December, then munch on hay and hay silage (stored grass) through the winter. They are also allowed to have a mineral supplement. Hartwell’s farm is not certified; certification for grass-fed animals means they are not given any antibiotics or hormones, and Hartwell occasionally uses antibiotics.

Why is grass-fed important? Some people think the meat tastes better. Additionally, grass changes the fat profile of the animal so that it contains more omega-3 fats – the kind that are good for you – and fewer omega-6 fats. “People have been conditioned to want lean meat, and in grain-fed versus grass-fed there’s no advantage in the lean parts,” Hartwell said. “All health benefits of grass-fed are in the fat. It’s all good fat versus bad fat.”

PASTURE-RAISED

The term means that the animal has been raised on pasture. It is not the same thing as grass-fed since pasture-raised animals may eat grains.

HERITAGE/HEIRLOOM

When you bite into an heirloom apple, or taste a forkful of roast pork from a heritage pig, you may be tasting the same flavors your great-grandmother enjoyed a century ago.

Heritage animals and heirloom fruits and vegetables have carried their traits and tastes over generations, thanks to farmers and gardeners who have seen their value and maintained their stock. Some are, perhaps, naturally drought-resistant, or maybe their fat has a particularly unique flavor. They are genetically distinct foods that, for one reason or another, have not fit into the industrialized food system and never became commercial crops. Scientists believe it’s important to preserve heritage and heirloom varieties partly because they are not as susceptible to being wiped out by diseases or pests as a modern monoculture crops.

 

NEXT WEEK: Green Glossary, Part Two

 

 

 


Via Giri Kumar
Invisible Gardener's insight:

Excellent except for the GMO info...you realize it's all G M O?

read my article entitled

Sone GMO are good and some are bad

on my blog

what we must control is GEO

Genetically Engineered Organism        

invisiblegardener.com

more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Invisible Gardener from Organic Farming
Scoop.it!

Farmer D and the tao of composting

Farmer D and the tao of composting | Earth Alert | Scoop.it
Daron Joffe's new book, 'Citizen Farmer,' offers a fresh look at farming and gardening, and it starts the way any great plot begins — with good dirt.

 

http://www.mnn.com/your-home/organic-farming-gardening/stories/farmer-d-and-the-tao-of-composting#

 

 


Via Giri Kumar
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Invisible Gardener from Organic Farming
Scoop.it!

Deploying microbes as a seed treatment for protection against soil-borne plant pathogens | Organic Farming Research Foundation

Deploying microbes as a seed treatment for protection against soil-borne plant pathogens | Organic Farming Research Foundation | Earth Alert | Scoop.it
Deploying microbes as a seed treatment for protection against soil-borne plant pathogens Plant diseases, especially those caused by soil-borne seed infecting pathogens, pose a serious threat to the production of both greenhouse and field crops. Conventional farming operations often use fumigants and chemical seed treatments, which can be harmful to human health and the environment, for controlling seed and seedling pathogens. The use of many of these materials is strictly prohibited in organic agriculture, limiting the options for organic farmers for plant disease control. Organic amendments such as compost and vermicompost are used as alternatives to synthetic control methods due, in part, to their success in controlling plant pathogens. Previous studies have confirmed consistent disease suppression using solid and liquid forms of organic amendments and the working hypothesis is that microbes are closely associated with suppression. Furthermore, only a subset of microbes from the bulk material that colonize the seed coat are responsible for disease suppression. So if the specific subset of microbes associated with seed colonization and suppression can be deployed as a seed treatment, can we still achieve plant protection from soil-borne pathogens? In addition, can this seed treatment application be developed for organic production as an effective tool for disease management? The goal of this project is to establish a proof-of-concept that compost and vermicompost microbes can be applied to the surface of seeds before sowing to protect against soil-borne plant pathogens. Liquid extracts will be produced from solid materials, freeze-dried to a powder form, and applied to the seed coat. Treated seeds will first be evaluated for disease suppression under laboratory conditions, and then tested for use on certified organic land. The information generated from this project has the potential to introduce a novel seed-treatment application for controlling plant pathogens in organic production systems. 
Via Giri Kumar
Invisible Gardener's insight:

Excellent.   Try compost tea

more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Invisible Gardener from Online Collaboration Tools
Scoop.it!

Upload and Share Image Sets Instantly with Feedbag.io

Upload and Share Image Sets Instantly with Feedbag.io | Earth Alert | Scoop.it

Via Robin Good
more...
aanve's curator insight, March 1, 2014 9:49 PM

www.aanve.com

 

Andy Padilla's curator insight, March 2, 2014 3:56 PM

Amazing free site if you looking to share your images. Come check it out guys!

Laura Salas's curator insight, November 22, 2015 11:30 AM

As an educator graphics and photography this app is wonderful! It has so many uses, I can't wait to use it with my students. As a collaboration tool it will be great to see them comment on each other's work instantly.