29.2K views | +3 today
antropologiaNet, dataviz, collective intelligence, algorithms, social learning, social change, digital humanities
Curated by luiy
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by luiy from Education and Cultural Change

elearnspace › Personal Learner Knowledge Graph | #PLKG #connectivism

elearnspace › Personal Learner Knowledge Graph | #PLKG #connectivism | e-Xploration | Scoop.it

Via Pierre Levy
luiy's insight:

What is needed in education is something like a Personal Learner Knowledge Graph (PLKG): a clear profile of what a learner knows. It doesn’t matter where the learner learned things – work, volunteering, hobbies, personal interest, formal schooling, etc. What matters is that learners are aware of what they know and how this is related to the course content/curriculum. In a sense, PLKG is like the semantic web or Google Knowledge Graph: a connected model of learner knowledge that can be navigated and assessed and ultimately “verified” by some organization in order to give a degree or designation (or something like it).


If the education system can make the transition to learner knowledge graphs, instead of mainly content, the system can start to be far more intelligent than it currently is. For example, if I’m a student who spends summer months idly consuming beverages, I will develop a different skill set than someone who spent their summer volunteering and working (see video below for a discussion I had with Steve Paikin on the Agenda). Yet when the two of us start university in fall, the system normalizes our knowledge to the curriculum. We get the same content even though we are different people with completely different skills and knowledge.

Claude Emond's curator insight, May 7, 2014 9:20 AM

«The big shift that needs to be made in education is to shift from knowing content to knowing learners»

Fàtima Galan's curator insight, May 8, 2014 5:08 AM

"What is needed in education is something like a Personal Learner Knowledge Graph (PLKG): a clear profile of what a learner knows."

Rescooped by luiy from Global Brain

franz contemplates complexity

A brief animated video on complex systems theory.

Via Anne Caspari, Spaceweaver
Anne Caspari's curator insight, February 1, 2013 10:32 AM

this is great food for thought; nicely done! 

Spaceweaver's curator insight, February 3, 2013 10:06 AM

Excellent introduction and some reference books at the end

Luciano Lampi's curator insight, March 25, 2013 9:48 AM

a cool start...

Rescooped by luiy from Complex Systems and X-Events

#Complex Thinking for a Complex World – About Reductionism, Disjunction and Systemism, by Edgar Morin

This article is based on the keynote address presented to the European Meetings on Cybernetics and Systems Research (EMCSR) in 2012, on the occasion of Edgar Morin receiving the Bertalanffy Prize in Complexity Thinking, awarded by the Bertalanffy Centre for the Study of Systems Science (BCSSS).

The following theses will be elaborated on: (a) The whole is at the same time more and less than its parts; (b) We must abandon the term "object" for systems because all the objects are systems and parts of systems; (c) System and organization are the two faces of the same reality; (d) Eco-systems illustrate self-organization.


Complex Thinking for a Complex World – About Reductionism, Disjunction and Systemism

Edgar Morin


Systema: connecting matter, life, culture and technology Vol 2, No 1 (2014)



Via Complexity Digest, Roger D. Jones, PhD
luiy's insight:

In this light is interesting to consider the nature of life. Living systems represent a complex type of organization. The organization of a living system is more complex than the  organization of the molecules of which it is composed. However, this organization is  achieved using only molecules from the physical universe – living systems are not made from something like ‘living matter’, but from ordinary physical and chemical substances.

“Life” is a property created through complex self-organisation. Life is characterized by processes of self-reproduction and self-repair, processes that involve knowledge and  memory. The central feature of a living system is the self-organizational capacity to produce
and reproduce itself. However, as von Foerster noted, calling this self-organisation is paradoxical, because the organizational processes of life require a continuous input of energy. We need energy even when we sleep – energy to drive our heartbeat, our digestion, our breathing. We use energy in all moments of life. However, we also need to compensate for the dissipation of energy in line with the second law of thermodynamics, and this means we must take in energy from the environment. We do this by ingesting material  that contains energy, and to this we need knowledge of the environment, and in particular knowledge of the organization of the environment. So self-organisation requires an interplay between the knowledge of how to organize the self and the knowledge of how the environment is organized.

Eli Levine's curator insight, April 13, 2014 10:21 PM

There is a kind of meditation in Buddhist practice known as analytical meditation.  It's purpose is to inform us about an object, all of its properties and all of the associations, connections and contexts that it can have in the individual and collective sense. 


We're not going to be perfect coming up with all of the connections all of the time.  However, I think it's a good starting basis for the purposes of analyzing complex systems and all of the layered, interconnected parts.  We are one, and one is all.


The universe is us as well as around us.

And that's a scientific fact, it seems.


Think about it.

Luciano Lampi's curator insight, April 14, 2014 2:37 PM

objects versus systems?