Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
|
|
Scooped by Mary Perfitt-Nelson onto Rethinking Public Education |
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Your new post is loading...
A simple illustration shows that the manner in which we usually measure school growth doesn't really measure growth at all.
Mary Perfitt-Nelson's insight:
"There’s something to be said for measuring performance over time and incentivizing improvement using available data, and changes in cross-sectional rates/scores are, for the moment, all that is available in many places (though that is changing). Nevertheless, we should always bear in mind that these changes are not “growth” or “gains,” and they often cannot identify the schools generating the most significant progress among their students (or lack thereof)" Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
I began teaching in 1991 believing myself to be a very progressive grades-based teacher with exquisitely designed marking keys designed to quantitatively assess realms such as punctuation, spelling...
Great read! Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
|
Mary Perfitt-Nelson's insight:
From Jen McDaniel's blogspot: In Search of Hecuba's Torch: An Educator's Quest for Meaning.
Resonating with me: 1. one assessment cannot serve every purpose. 2. because we are unable to see the reasoning behind the choice, we are unable to see where students went wrong 3. the Finnish students rarely take multiple-choice assessments 4. if we glean no useful information about individual students 5. we do what we know to do and that when we know better, we do better. Not in this case. Further questions are now percolating. Nice job @jemmuldoon ! Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
No
|



Your new post is loading...