Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity
60 views | +0 today
Follow
Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity
How do we make decisions when faced with complex problems where relationships are continuously shifting? This board explores human decision-making capabilities from a complexity theory perspective.
Curated by Susan Williams
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Susan Williams from Leadership
Scoop.it!

Why More Leaders Are Turning to Values-Based Decision-Making

Why More Leaders Are Turning to Values-Based Decision-Making | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
Every supervisor, manager and leader in every organization makes hundreds of decisions every week. The decisions we make are always motivated by either our personal or organizational needs. …

Via Anne Leong
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

Power and Ecosystems of Change: Ann Pendleton-Jullian at TEDxGeorgetown

In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TED...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

A Primer On Worldviews And Sense-Making In Foresight Practice ...

What do we mean by innovation? What are we trying to create? What does this say about what we value? Why does asking these questions matter? Launching the Centre for Australian Foresight's “Occasional Papers” series ...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

ADR: Mediation, Neuroscience And Your Brain

ADR: Mediation, Neuroscience And Your Brain | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
Real estate agents suggest the aroma of baking bread or cookies entices clients to buy houses. Stylists recommend wearing red because it implies power.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

The Real Neuroscience of Creativity - Scientifi...

The Real Neuroscience of Creativity - Scientifi... | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
Scientific American (blog) The Real Neuroscience of Creativity Scientific American (blog) Scott Barry Kaufman is a cognitive psychologist interested in the development of intelligence and creativity.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

Colin Camerer: Neuroscience, game theory, monkeys

When two people are trying to make a deal -- whether they're competing or cooperating -- what's really going on inside their brains? Behavioral economist Col...
more...
No comment yet.
Rescooped by Susan Williams from FuturICT Journal Publications
Scoop.it!

Dirk Helbing: How and why our conventional economic thinking causes global crises (discussion paper) - Econophysics Forum

How and why our conventional economic thinking causes global crises (discussion paper)20-02-13

Dik Helbing (ETH Zurich)

I believe it’s no wonder that our world is in trouble. We currently lack the global systems science needed to understand our world, which is now changing more quickly than we can collect the experience required to cope with upcoming problems. We can also not trust our intuition, since the complex systems we have created behave often in surprising, counter-intuitive ways. Frequently, their properties are not determined by their components, but their interactions. Therefore, a strongly coupled world behaves fundamentally different from a weakly coupled world with independent decision-makers. Strong interactions tend to make the system uncontrollable – they create cascading effects and extreme events.

As a consequence of the transition to a more and more strongly coupled world, we need to revisit the underlying assumptions of the currently prevailing economic thinking. In the following, I will discuss 10 widespread assertions, which would work in a perfect economic world with representative agents and uncorrelated decisions, where heterogeneity, decision errors, and time scales do not matter. However, they are apparently not well enough suited to depict the strongly interdependent, diverse, and quickly changing world, we are facing, and this has important implications. Therefore, we need to ‘think out of the box’ and require a paradigm shift towards a new economic thinking characterized by a systemic, interaction-oriented perspective inspired by knowledge about complex, ecological, and social systems. As Albert Einstein noted, long-standing problems are rarely solved within the dominating paradigm. However, a new perspective on old problems may enable new mitigation strategies

 

1. More networking is good and reduces risks

Many human-made systems and services are based on networking. While some degree of networking is apparently good, too much connectivity may also create systemic risks and pathways for cascading effects. These may cause extreme events and global crises like the current financial crisis.

 

Moreover, in social dilemma situations (where unfair behavior or cheating creates individual benefits), too much networking creates a breakdown of cooperation and trust, while local or regional interactions may promote cooperation. The transformation of the financial system into a global village, where any agent can interact with any other agent, may actually have been the root cause of our current financial crisis.

Countermeasures: Limit the degree of networking to a healthy amount and/or introduce adaptive decoupling strategies to stop cascading effects and enable graceful degradation (including slow-down mechanisms in crisis situations). Support the evolution and co-existence of several weakly coupled financial systems (to reduce systemic vulnerability, stimulate competition between systems, and create backup solutions). Reduce the complexity of financial products and improve the transparency of financial interdependencies and over-the-counter transactions by creating suitable information platforms.

 

2. The economy drives towards an equilibrium state

Current economic thinking is based on the assumption that the economic system is in equilibrium or at least tends to develop towards a state of equilibrium. However, today’s world changes faster than many companies and policies can adapt. Therefore, the world economic system is unlikely to be in equilibrium at any point in time. It is rather expected to show a complex non-equilibrium dynamics.

Therefore, a new economic thinking inspired by complex dynamical systems, ecosystems, and social systems would be beneficial. Such a perspective would also have implications for the robustness of economic systems. Overall, beneficial properties seem to be: redundancy, variety, sparseness, decoupling (separated communities, niches), and mutually adjusted time scales (which are required for hierarchical structures to function well).

Countermeasures: Invest into new economic systems thinking. Combine the axiomatic, mathematical approach of economics with a ‘natural science approach’ based on data and experiments. Develop non-equilibrium network models capturing the self-organized dynamics of real economic systems. Pursue an interdisciplinary approach, taking on board complex, ecological and social systems thinking. Develop better concepts for systemic risk assessment, systems design, and integrated risk management.

3. Individuals and companies decide rationally

The ‘homo economicus’ is a widely used paradigm in economics. It is the basis of a large and beautiful body of mathematical proofs on idealized economic systems. However, the paradigm of a strictly optimizing, perfect egoist is a model, which is questioned by theoretical and empirical results.

Theoretically, the paradigm assumes unrealistic information storage and processing capacities (everyone would need to have a full 1:1 representation of the entire world in the own brain and an instant data processing of huge amounts of data, including the anticipation of future decisions of others). Empirically, one finds that people behave in a more cooperative and fair way than the paradigm of the ‘homo economicus’ predicts. In particular, the paradigm neglects the role of errors, emotions, other-regarding preferences, etc. This implies significant deviations of real human behaviors from theoretically predicted ones.

Countermeasure: Use a combination of interactive behavioral experiments, agent-based modeling, data mining and social supercomputing to study (aspects of) real(istic) economic systems

4. Selfish behavior optimizes the systemic performance and benefits everyone

Another pillar of conventional economic thinking is Adam Smith’s principle of the ‘invisible hand’, according to which selfish profit maximization would automatically lead to the best systemic outcome based on self-organization. It is the basis of the ideology of ‘free markets’, according to which regulation would tend to reduce the performance of economic systems.

However, models in evolutionary game theory show that self-organized coordination in markets can easily fail, even when market participants have equal power, symmetrical information etc. Moreover, even if the individually optimal behavior also maximizes system performance and if everybody behaves very close to optimal, this may still create a systemic failure (e.g. when the system optimum is unstable). Therefore, it is highly questionable whether the systemic inefficiencies resulting from individual optimization efforts can always be compensated for by greedy motivations (such as trying to get more than before or more than others).

Countermeasures: Measure the system state in real-time and respond to this information adaptively in a way that promotes coordination and cooperation with the interaction partners. Create an information and communication system supporting collective (self-)awareness of the impact of human actions on our world. Increase opportunities for social, economic and political participation

5. Financial markets are efficient

One implication of Adam Smith’s principle of the ‘invisible hand’ is the efficiency of financial markets, according to which any opportunity to make money with a probability higher than chance would immediately be used, thereby eliminating such opportunities and any related market inefficiencies.

 

Efficient markets should not create bubbles and crashes, and therefore one would not need contingency plans for financial crises (they could simply not occur). Financial markets would rather be in equilibrium as the conventional Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Models suggest. However, many people believe that bubbles and crashes do occur. The flash crash of May 6, 2010, is a good example of a market irregularity, which has repeatedly occurred in the meantime. Also, many financial traders do not seem to believe in efficient markets, but rather in the existence of opportunities that can be used to make over-proportional profits.

Countermeasures: Develop contingency plans for financial crises. Adjust the financial architecture and identify suitable strategies (such as breaking points) to stop cascading effects in the financial system. Introduce noise into financial markets by random trading transactions to destroy bubbles before they reach a critical size that may have a disastrous systemic impact.

6. More information and financial innovations are good

One common view is that market inefficiencies result from an unequal distribution of power, which partially results from information asymmetries (“knowledge is power”). Therefore, providing more information to everyone should remove the related inefficiencies.

However, too much information creates a cognitive information overload. As a result, people tend to orient at other people’s behaviors and information sources they trust. As a consequence, people do not anymore take independent decisions, which can undermine the ‘wisdom of crowds’ and market efficiency. One example is the large and unhealthy impact that the assessments of a few rating agencies have on the global markets.

It is also believed that financial innovations will make markets more efficient by making markets more complete. However, it has been shown that complete markets are unstable. In fact, leverage effects, ‘naked’ short-selling (of assets one does not own), credit default swaps, high-frequency trading and other financial instruments may have a destabilizing effect on financial markets.

Countermeasures: Identify and pursue decentralized, pluralistic, participatory information platforms, which support the ‘wisdom of crowds’ effect. Test financial instruments (such as derivatives) for systemic impacts (e.g. by suitable experiments and computer simulations) and certify them before they are released, as this is common in other economic sectors (special safety regulations apply, for example, in the electrical, automobile, pharmacy and food sectors).

 

7. More liquidity is better

Another wide-spread measure to cure economic crises are cheap loans provided by central banks. While this is intended to keep the economy running and to promote investments in the real economy, most of this money seems to go into financial speculation, since business and investment banks are not sufficiently separated.

This can cause bubbles in the financial and real estate markets, where much of these cheap loans are invested. However, the high returns in the resulting ‘bull markets’ are not sustainable, since they depend on the continued availability of cheap loans. Sooner or later, the created bubbles will implode and the financial market will crash (the likelihood of which goes up when the interest rates are increased). This again forces central banks to reduce interest rates to a minimum in order to keep the economy going and promote investments and growth. In other words, too much liquidity is as much of a problem, as is too little.

Countermeasure: Separate investment from business banking and introduce suitable adaptive transaction fees.

 

8. All agents can be treated as if acting in the same way

The ‘representative agent approach’ is another important concept of conventional economic thinking. Assuming that everyone would behave optimally, as the paradigm of the ‘homo economicus’ predicts, in equivalent situations everybody should behave the same. This allows one to replace the interaction of an economic agent with other agents by interactions with average agents, in particularly if one assumes that everyone has access to the same information and participates in perfect markets.

However, the representative agent model cannot describe cascade effects well. These are not determined by the averagestability, but by the weakest link. The ‘representative agent approach’ also neglects effects of spatial interactions and heterogeneities in the preferences of market participants. When these are considered, the conclusions can be completely different, sometimes even opposite (e.g. there may be an ‘outbreak’ rather than a breakdown of cooperative behavior).

Finally, the representative agent approach does not allow one to understand particular effects of the interaction network structure, which may promote or obstruct cooperativeness, trust, public safety, etc. Neglecting such network effects can lead to a serious underestimation of the importance of ‘social capital’ for the creation of economic value and social well-being.

Countermeasures: Protect economic and social diversity. Allow for the existence of niche markets and for the consideration of justified local advantages. Avoid competition on one single dimension (e.g. economic value generation) and promote multi-criterion incentive systems. Develop better compasses for decision-making than GDP per capita, taking into account environmental, health, and social factors. Make social capital (such as cooperativeness, trust, public safety, …) measurable.

 

9. Regulation can fix the imperfections of economic systems

When the self-organization of markets does not work perfectly, one often tries to ‘fix the problem’ by regulation. However, complex systems cannot be steered ‘like a bus’, and many control attempts fail. In many cases, the information required to regulate a complex system is not available, and even if one would have a surveillance system that monitors all variables of the system, one would frequently not know what the relevant control parameters are. Besides, suitable regulatory instruments are often lacking.

A more promising way to manage complexity is to facilitate or guide favorable self-organization. This is often possible by modifying the interactions between the system components. It basically requires one to establish targeted real-time information feedbacks, suitable ‘rules of the game’, and sanctioning mechanisms. To stay consistent with the approach of self-organization, sanctioning should as far as possible be done in a decentralized, self-regulatory way (as it is characteristic for social norms or the immune systems).

Countermeasures: Pursue a cybernetic and synergetic approach, promoting favorable self-organization by small changes in the interactions between the system elements, i.e. by fixing suitable ‘rules of the game’ to avoid instabilities and suboptimal systemic states. (Symmetry, fairness, and balance may be such principles.) Introduce a global but decentralized and manipulation-resistant multi-criterion rating system, community-specific reputation system, and pluralistic recommender system encouraging rule-compatible behavior.

 

10. Moral behavior is always costly

Species that do not strictly optimize their benefits are often assumed to disappear eventually due to the principles of natural selection implied by the theory of evolution. As a consequence, a ‘homo economicus’ should remain, and moral decision-making, which constrains oneself to a subset of available options, would vanish.

This certainly applies, if one forces everybody to interact with everybody else on equal footing, as the concept of perfect, free markets demands. In fact, evolutionary game-theoretical models show that these are conditions under which a ‘tragedy of the commons’ tends to occur, and where cooperation, fairness and trust tend to erode. On the other hand, social systems have found mechanisms to avoid the erosion of social capital. These mechanisms include repeated interactions, reputation effects, community interactions, group competition, sanctioning of improper behavior etc. In particular, decentralized market interactions seem to support fairness.

Countermeasures: Promote value-sensitive designs of monetary systems and information and communication systems. For example, introduce two co-existing, interacting, competitive exchange systems: one for anonymous (trans)actions (as we largely have them today) and one for accountable, traceable (trans)actions (creating ‘social’ money or information). Additionally, introduce suitable transaction costs to create incentives for accountable, responsible (trans)actions and to promote ethical behavior.

 

Summary

In conclusion, we are now living in a strongly coupled and strongly interdependent world, which poses new challenges. While it is probably unrealistic to go back beyond the level of networking and globalization we have reached, there is a great potential to develop new management approaches for our complex world based on suitable interaction rules and adaptive concepts, using real-time measurements.

It must be underlined that our current financial and economic problems cannot be solved within the current economic mainstream paradigm(s). We need to change our perspective on the financial and economic system and pursue new policies. The following recommendations are made:

Adjust the perspective of our world to the fundamentally changed properties of the globalized, strongly interdependent techno-socio-economic-environmental system we have created and its resulting complex, emergent dynamic system behavior.

Make large-scale investments into new economic thinking, particularly multi-disciplinary research involving knowledge from sociology, ecology, complexity science, and cybernetics.

Support diversity in the system, responsible innovation, and multi-dimensional competition.

Recognize the benefits of local and regional interactions for the creation of social capital such as cooperativeness, fairness, trust, etc.

Require an advance testing of financial instruments and innovations for systemic impacts and restrict destabilizing instruments.

Identify and establish a suitable institutional framework for interactions (suitable ‘rules of the game’) in order to promote a favorable self-organization.

Implement better, value-sensitive incentive systems to foster more responsible action.

Establish a universal, global reputation system to promote fair behavior and allow ethical behavior to survive in a competitive world.

Create new compasses for political decision-making, considering environment, health, social capital, and social well-being.

Develop new tools to facilitate the assessment of likely consequences of our decisions and actions (the ‘social footprint’). These tools may, for example, include:

 

-a 'Planetary Nervous System' to enable collective awareness of the state of our world and society in real-time,

-a 'Living Earth Simulator' to explore side effects and opportunities of human decisions and actions,

-a 'Global Participatory Platform' to create opportunities for social, economic and political participation,

-exchange systems that support value-oriented interactions.


Via FuturICT
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

The End of Neuro-Nonsense - Slate Magazine

The End of Neuro-Nonsense - Slate Magazine | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
Slate Magazine
The End of Neuro-Nonsense
Slate Magazine
At the beginning of the month, Slate contributor Sally Satel and Scott O.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

Humans Are the World's Best Pattern-Recognition Machines, But for How Long? | Endless Innovation | Big Think

Humans Are the World's Best Pattern-Recognition Machines, But for How Long? | Endless Innovation | Big Think | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
Not only are machines rapidly catching up to - and exceeding - humans in terms of raw computing power, they are also starting to do things that we used to consider inherently human. They can feel emotions like regret. They can daydream.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

Bursting the Neuro-Utopian Bubble

Bursting the Neuro-Utopian Bubble | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
Pyschosocial problems cannot simply be solved in the neuroscientist’s lab.
Susan Williams's insight:

An interesting article which questions the scientific approach to complexity. The question is, if something is complex, can it be taken apart and mapped? Not if the complex system is dynamic and continuously adapting. 

more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

COMPLEXITY, PROBLEM SOLVING, AND SUSTAINABLE SOCIETIES

COMPLEXITY, PROBLEM SOLVING, AND SUSTAINABLE SOCIETIES | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
Historical knowledge is essential to practical applications of ecological economics. Systems of problem solving develop greater complexity and higher costs over long periods. In time such systems either require increasing ...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

Does Language Shape What We See?

Does Language Shape What We See? | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
At this very moment, your eyes and brain are performing an astounding series of coordinated operations. Light rays from the screen are hitting your retina, the sheet of light-sensitive cells that l...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

Ross Simmonds (TheCoolestCool) on Twitter

Ross Simmonds (TheCoolestCool) on Twitter | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
The latest from Ross Simmonds (@TheCoolestCool). Digital Strategist | Startup Whisperer | Speaker | Writer | Football Fan Love Fresh Prince of Bel Air Re-Runs & Technology. Canada
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

10 Ways We Get Smarter As We Age | TIME.com

10 Ways We Get Smarter As We Age | TIME.com | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
As we age, the brain's processing speed begins to slow, and memory may sometimes slip. But there are other ways that our mental powers grow as we get older. (Neuroscience shows us 10 ways we get smarter as we age.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

Handaxe Design Traditions Reveal Cultural Complexity among Neanderthals - Nature World News

Handaxe Design Traditions Reveal Cultural Complexity among Neanderthals - Nature World News | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
Nature World News Handaxe Design Traditions Reveal Cultural Complexity among Neanderthals Nature World News Dr Karen Ruebens from the Centre for the Archaeology of Human Origins (CAHO) looked at the design of over 1,300 stone tools from 80 sites in...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

Brainwashed: Neuroscience and Its Perversions

Brainwashed: Neuroscience and Its Perversions | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
Sally Satel and Scott Lilienfeld have written a new book, Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience. Its purpose is not to critique neuroscience, but to expose and protest its mind...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

Cognitive Psychology in Crisis: Ameliorating the Shortcomings of Representationalism [AudioFix]

Better quality audio in this clip compared to the previous. Thesis now published at Lund University Publications; http://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/o.o.i.s?id=...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

Mindfulness can improve leadership in times of instability - The Guardian

Mindfulness can improve leadership in times of instability - The Guardian | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
The Guardian
Mindfulness can improve leadership in times of instability
The Guardian
Developing a more aware and considered approach helps leaders to respond to situations (whether internal thoughts or external events), rather than react to them.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

The Joys Of Screwing Up - LinkedIn Today

The Joys Of Screwing Up - LinkedIn Today | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
The Joys Of Screwing Up
LinkedIn Today
Real sensemaking only occurs in highly ambiguous situations where uncertainty not only elicits new ideas but provokes new ways of thinking.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

No lotus position needed: Neuroscience pushes meditation into the mainstream

No lotus position needed: Neuroscience pushes meditation into the mainstream | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
When the Rev. Ron Moor began meditating 30 years ago, he did so in secret.
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

[1308.1746] Online Decision Making in Crowdsourcing Markets ...

Much of the existing theoretical work on crowdsourcing markets has focused on problems that fall into the broad category of online decision making; task requesters or the crowdsourcing platform itself make repeated ...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

What can a brain scan tell us about free will?

What can a brain scan tell us about free will? | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
We think we have control of our actions. But if a brain tumour can change our personality, what does it tell us about free will? (Neuroscience vs Philosophy | What can a brain scan tell us about free will?
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

To Simply Examine the Complexity of the Law - Improbable ...

To Simply Examine the Complexity of the Law - Improbable ... | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
“This implies some sort of 'scaling' relationship that could be evaluated by comparing some reasonably accepted measure of societal complexity with that of legal complexity. There is unlikely to be strict coupling between ...
more...
No comment yet.
Scooped by Susan Williams
Scoop.it!

Newly Discovered ‘Switch’ Plays Dual Role in Memory Formation

Newly Discovered ‘Switch’ Plays Dual Role in Memory Formation | Pattern recognition, sensemaking, decision-making and complexity | Scoop.it
Researchers discover a protein switch which can increase or decrease memory building, depending on the signal it detects.
more...
No comment yet.