Let me start off by saying that this topic is and will be somewhat bias not because of my personal views on the topic at hand but because of the lack of common sense that some people in the government have when it comes to the issue of cyber bullying. The idea of cyber bullying is the use of electronic means to taunt or harass an individual on basically just about anything (most known description of the word). There have been numerous instances of cyber bullying extending from something that happens when people are face to face and then leading to the constant online abuse of the individual.
The saddest part about this is the fact that most of the cyber bullying takes place among younger children. I don’t care how young a child is, (most often ages 10-16 partake in this practice) there is no excuse for cyber bullying. I don’t understand what process goes in the head of the people that take part in cyber bullying. Why should other people suffer because you’re having a bad day? You had a rough childhood and now you need to feel superior so you pick on other people and talk down to them so you can feel better? This is a pathetic excuse and is one that shouldn’t hold water in any case that leads to a death. I’m sorry the person that took part in a cyber-bullying case had such a rough childhood. They need to suck it up and mature instead of picking on others to cover up their own insecurities.
The reason why this topic always hits home with me is the fact that I was bullied in elementary school and middle school because I couldn’t speak English. I was cyber bullied throughout middle school for the same reasons. Now when I went to high school and after graduation, I heard about a few people that took part in this bullying have passed away. You want me to go to a funeral for a person that made my life a living hell for years? I would love to attend and piss on their grave in all honesty but just the thought of going to a funeral and people expecting “remorse” for a person that took part in something as atrocious as that made me sick to my stomach. Especially considering the amount of lives that people that do this kind of thing to younger children negatively effect. They directly lead to many suicides each and every single year. They lead to suicidal thoughts among young children because everybody just wants to be accepted and let’s be honest, they’re young children.
While most of the articles that I have chosen agree with my stance on this topic, the idea from the Maryland judicial system that says that an anti-bullying law could be “unconstitutional” is truly and utterly pathetic in my opinion. They want to argue that “freedom of speech” is impeded if you stop a person from saying what they want to say? How anybody with half a brain could possibly argue that point to a group of people who have suffered through something such as cyber bullying is beyond me. The people in that voting process need to look at themselves in the face and vote with some common sense and not so much political bullshit.
A 2013 Maryland General Assembly bill bearing the name of a Howard County teenager who killed herself last year is expected to be signed into law, but it stands on shaky constitutional ground, an official of the Maryland ACLU said.The "Misuse of...
What's the impact of sibling bullying? Your Say USA TODAY A new study in the journal "Pediatrics" found that "sibling aggression is linked to worse mental health" for the victim. Comments from Facebook: Sibling bullying is simply a rite of passage.
Following a year of fact gathering, lawmaking, statewide hearings, and public comment a statewide school cyberbullying policy championed by Attorney General Beau Biden and Lt. Governor Matt Denn takes effect this week.
With the discovery that the Department of Justice had secretly obtained phone records from the Associated Press, members of Congress have suggested enacting a shield law for the media.
A shield law would open the door to more government abuse of power. In the last few years, the executive branch has attempted to dismantle the rule of law by unilaterally deciding which laws to enforce and which to ignore. If the federal government were to seize the ability to determine which rights the American people can exercise and which rights they cannot, the American way of life would cease to exist. What is truly disheartening, is that this subject matter should not even be needing to be discussed in Congress or anywhere else. The Constitution guarantees everyone the freedom of speech ,and the freedom of the press. Any American has the right to print, broadcast or make any statement they wish. The reason congress is talking about a shield law is because it will give them another way to infringe on our rights. Passing a shield law would give the government the power to determine whether certain types of speech were acceptable as media or unacceptable because it wasn’t in line with the narrative of the day. The shield law is designed to give the politicians a shield from criticism by giving them the authority to define speech in a way that protects them.
Sharing your scoops to your social media accounts is a must to distribute your curated content. Not only will it drive traffic and leads through your content, but it will help show your expertise with your followers.
How to integrate my topics' content to my website?
Integrating your curated content to your website or blog will allow you to increase your website visitors’ engagement, boost SEO and acquire new visitors. By redirecting your social media traffic to your website, Scoop.it will also help you generate more qualified traffic and leads from your curation work.
Distributing your curated content through a newsletter is a great way to nurture and engage your email subscribers will developing your traffic and visibility.
Creating engaging newsletters with your curated content is really easy.