SEARCHERS returned from the forests and fields in and around Clayton, N.J., Sunday night, their voices hoarse from calling out the name of missing Autumn Pasquale, and those who loved her the most...
Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
Your new post is loading...
Mwlvin Colley's curator insight,
Today, 5:27 PM
Wow! I understand where the mother is coming from, and I also understand where the court is coming from in judgment. However, I do not understand why his sentencing is so light. The fact is a person was killed and someone needs to pay for this. This doesn't sound like just any accidental death, a man pulled a trigger and shot a woman. Sometimes I wonder what the world is coming to. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Keith Swift's comment,
Today, 3:37 AM
This was one brave woman... I commend her for confronting them... I think that these two individuals are very disturbed. Not just for doing what they did but for the way they did it. In my opinion they didn't even really have a plan they just waited for a soldier, beheaded him, and then stuck around and waited to get shot by police... to me this shows poor planning and not something that would be done by a terrorist cell. To me it just shows disturbed individuals.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Alysha Childs's comment,
May 22, 11:44 PM
Wow, this article is a lot different than the other articles that I've read today on the same subject. The news this morning and the articles I've been reading all days have been about a radical extremist who attacked an FBI agent when asked to sign the confession he had made to the police earlier. In this article, it appears only the friends of the man were interviewed, and little information seems to be given about the reasons why. It bothers me that only one tiny paragraph was given about the triple murder that police appear to have tied the man to, and it is never mentioned again in the article. I felt like the article made the man out to be a friendly man who was unfairly accused and then stalked by the police and FBI until his death his morning. Then when I watched the video of the friend of the deceased’s response to the news of the death, all I could think was “this guy’s practically telling us all he’s guilty too! Why isn’t he in jail?” When he was saying that one of them dying was the worst case scenario, and they had thought they would just be arrested, I feel like that’s a sign of guilt. If you haven’t done anything wrong, you don’t expect to be arrested. I just felt like this article was very contradictory to the video that was shown with it, and I’m curious what more we will learn in the approaching weeks about the events that took place.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Rachael Gray's comment,
May 20, 5:35 PM
I think it is scary to know that we almost can't feel safe anywhere we go. Anymore you hear about shootings in places that you should feel safe to go like a store, a movie, a parade, a marathon, school, etc. These aren't bad people getting hurt, they are our neighbors, our family, and our friends that are experiencing horrible things when doing simple chores or fun activities. I really enjoy hearing that they are standing up against this. Letting the "bad guys" know that they are going to protect and take back control of the area. There are still good people out there!
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Danya Schimmack's comment,
May 22, 1:49 AM
Such a tragic story, and they are both so young. I cannot imagine the families devastation. I am curious though about what led the brother to his actions, perhaps mental illness will turn out to be a factor.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Alysha Childs's comment,
May 23, 12:05 AM
I think that this is a wonderful thing, and I’m glad that nonviolent offenders are being given a chance to avoid suspensions and use better methods instead to build relationships with teachers and classmates. Although I certainly can’t speak for every high school in the world, in my experience punishments were doled out to students very unfairly. The kids who came from money, or the kids who were engaged in class, or the kids who had a parent working for the school district were often given little to no punishment for things they had done wrong, or teachers would even refuse to investigate problems that were brought up. Kids who perhaps had less sway would often be targeted and searched out for wrongdoing, and given harsh punishment if any wrongdoing was discovered. For example, one day a friend and I were walking back into school after going for a walk during our break outside of class, and a teacher stopped us thinking we had smoking doing pot(we hadn’t). The teacher called another teacher over to witness the search, and the other teacher stopped her and said “No, this is Alysha Childs. She did nothing wrong, let her and her friend go”. Even though I was really glad that the teacher had stood up for me and trusted me, I realized that the same courtesy would not have been extended to my friend had I not been there, and that bothered me (obviously a lot, considering I still remember it six years later). Restorative justice is a wonderful thing, and teaching kids that they have a purpose, that even if they did do something wrong it doesn’t make them a bad person is great. Taking kids away from the school, away from the resources available to them, instead can be damaging and further impair their ability to learn and graduate. Anything that can be done to keep kids in school give them better opportunities is a good thing in my book, and I'm happy that Fresno seems to be backing this new program.
Mwlvin Colley's curator insight,
Today, 5:50 PM
I think that this is a good idea and a perfect place to start this new kind of justice. I would like to see this type of justice being implemented in some rural areas of Alaska for some of the non-violent crimes. I am very interested to see where this goes and what comes of it. How people will respond to it and how it makes a difference in recidivism. Only time will tell. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
Brittany Schilling's comment,
May 23, 4:55 AM
This is something out of a CSI or another crime show. Poisoning letters to politicians is not something new but is not something people hear every day. Glad the man got caught before anyone was seriously injured.
Rob Duke's comment,
May 23, 2:48 PM
It was a precursor to Ricin (maybe ground castor beans) so this may have been a pretty crude attempt).
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Rachael Gray's comment,
May 20, 5:26 PM
This is such a complicated topic; how to punish the mentally ill. Personally, someone who gathers ammo and guns and comes prepared is someone who isn't mentally ill. He had a plan and he executed it. It would be a different story is he just showed up to watch the movie and then all of a sudden wiped out a weapon and start killing. I guess the other question is how do you punish those suffering from mental disorders. Just because you have a problem doesn't mean you shouldn't get punished. Whether mentally ill or sane; this man needs a punishment to fit the crime.
Alysha Childs's comment,
May 22, 11:23 PM
I would like to believe that no sane man in the world would be able to walk into a crowded movie theater dressed as the Joker and open fire on a crowd of innocent people. To me, there has to be some form of mental illness that allowed him to act that way with no provocation or reason. On the other hand, I don't feel that this should mitigate what he did. This man was a functioning member of society, he knew right from wrong, graduated college with a 3.9, and continued onto Grad school. He understood completely the impact of his actions, and performed them anyways. For this, I feel that an insanity defense would be inappropriate. He had the rational thought to acquire large amounts of ammunition and the ability to process in his mind what he was doing. To me, if he was able to understand what he was doing and why it was wrong, he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law (or just shot in the head in the near future in order to save the tax payers a huge amount of money).
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Keith Swift's comment,
Today, 4:07 AM
To start off, I thank this "gun carrying man" he did save lives that day... Now am I the only one who caught that they were down playing the knife as a weapon, "Police say the suspect purchased a knife inside the store and then turned it into a weapon." Sorry but the knife didn't change. It was always the same it was used in a bad way but it wasn't turned into anything other than a knife. I only make this point because it seems they are setting a double standard for knives and guns. By this standard a gun is always a weapon and a knife is only a weapon when it stabs. It seems like they are down playing the weapon aspect because it was a knife and not a gun. In my opinion if it was a gun used to shoot someone they would have made a much bigger deal. Just something I noticed
Rob Duke's comment,
Today, 1:55 PM
It's surprising that this made national news since the rescuer did shoot the stabber.
Mwlvin Colley's curator insight,
Today, 5:44 PM
It goes to show that restricted gun laws can have negative effect. As the saying goes, guns don't kill people, people kill people. If that gunmen wasn't there, who know what might have happened. I also think that it was really good the stabber was not shot, but controlled with the gun. As you might have guessed, I think that guns should be carried by competent citizens. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|