*The National Security Agency (NSA) and its British counterpart (GCHQ) are "attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of dec...
Randy L. Dixon Rivera's insight:
Just when I was about to erase you guys from my "HACTIVISM" sources, you redeem yourselves with this excellent report! However, I still think you guys are dead wrong on#GunControl issues. Walk a mile in my shoes as a former Cop and perhaps you'd better understand why people need to learn to defend themselves. Some how, some way.... we need to fix our own "weak point" so the government(s) propaganda machines can't take advantage of it. ;) As always #OATH not #NDAA
Sears Holdings Corp., the retailer run by hedge fund manager Edward Lampert, is investigating a possible security breach after a series of cyberattacks on other retailers have exposed the data of millions of consumers.
Law enforcement agencies throughout California have been flooded with concealed weapon applications in recent weeks, in the wake of a federal court ruling that loosens the restrictions on citizens’ ability to carry a concealed handgun in public.
Let's look at this act so you can really see what this does:
Gowdy says this Act will give Congress authority to force Obama to follow the law. What a joke. Congress ALREADY has that power, its called SEPARATION OF POWERS and can be asserted through Article 1 section 7 of the Constitution! http://bit.ly/1eoPaYW
There are HUGE problems with this act.
In in the very first paragraph of the summary we are told:
"Article II, Section 3, of the U.S. Constitution declares that the President “shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” However, President Obama has failed on several occasions to enforce Acts of Congress that he disagrees with for policy reasons and has also STRETCHED HIS REGULATORY POWER to put in place policies that Congress has refused to enact." (emphasis mine)
In this bill Congress is RECOGNIZING the president has REGULATORY POWER!l
Seriously??? The President DOES NOT Constitutionally posses regulatory power. And that IS the problem. This Act will make it a matter of recognized law that the President possess unconstitutional power.
This Act puts the power in the hands of FEDERAL COURTS and the SUPREME COURT to check the executive branch and REMOVES that power from Congress.
Congress says in this bill that when the president steals Congressional power through regulation or refusal to enforce law, Congress will then SUE the president in the FEDERAL courts to stop him.
QUESTION: What happens when the federal courts rule in favor of the PRESIDENT? According to this Act, Congress must just bow its head in allegiance to the President and the federal courts and submit to tyranny.
But what do THEY have to worry about? They can always exempt themselves from the law. The chains and bonds they accept will BIND US, not them!
Separation of powers has been destroyed at the hands of Congress. And now our "political conservative heroes" like Trey Gowdy are going to hand over more power to the President and enslave our children.
Good news there is no way this bill will pass. Bad news, how many "conservatives" will PRAISE Gowdy and his crew for "attempting to stop the president"?
If Gowdy and his crew REALLY WANTED to stop the president, they could do it RIGHT NOW under Article 1 section 7, the power of the purse, which gives the House the sole power to immediately DEFUND all these unconstitutional regulatory agencies and STOP OBAMA's regulations once and for all!
LEARN MORE about Article 1 section 7 here:http://bit.ly/1eoPaYW ; "
If Edward Snowden isn’t very careful, they’re going to crush his head! The fate of Edward Snowden continues to be excruciatingly unresolved. The former NSA contractor who made international headlines in 2013 when he illegally disclosed details about the shocking scope of federal surveillance programs via The Guardian and other news outlets has been obliged to seek asylum from various non-U.S.-aligned governments, such as Russia, Ecuador, and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. Nobody really disputes that Snowden has committed criminal acts—no matter how justified—and yet the intransigent stance of the U.S. to hold over Snowden’s head the most draconian penalties (short of the death penalty, praise Jeebus). Attorney General Eric Holder promised that Snowden would not…
How I support the troops. If you like this video, feel free to check out the website, josietheoutlaw.com follow Josie on Twitter at @JosietheOutlaw1 on Insta...
Randy L. Dixon Rivera's insight:
Randy Dixon 4:13 AM I joined the US Military so Americans like her could disagree with me, even burn our flag if that makes them feel all warm and fuzzy inside. It's called Freedom & Liberty people. I think she don't realize the horrific options our troops are actually given under the UCMJ if they refuse to OBEY (even unlawful orders). We all know the system is rigged and there's no justice for the little guy. That's all been a LIE. With that said I understand her. I think her heart is in the right place. She cares that our troops are being lied to. That our troops are being used as disposable cannon fodder and PAWNS to make rich men richer. When is the last time we actually just defended America itself? Hell our borders are wide OPEN! How many years ago was 911? We all well know Iraq was a big fat lie. OBL is dead, so why in the hell are we still screwing with them folks and wasting the taxpayer's money and our soldier's lives? Oh they're going to fall back into terrorism? They sure will and ARE! Especially with Obama's treasonous help like in Syria. It's all been for nothing, if we don't have Freedom and Liberty here in America! We've slaughtered a million of them, when should we call it quits? Should we slaughter another million then call it quits? How about "6 million" ..would that be enough to call it quits? Hell right now while our troops fight & die for our Freedom and Liberty over there....here in America our own U.S. Government has declared a war on law-abiding citizens or haven't you folks Googled #NDAA 2012 yet? Ya know, the 'Law of War' to be used against ANY of US right here at home? How about the meticulous and methodical disarmament of millions of law-abiding Americans happening right now under the disguise of it being perfectly lawful (but not constitutional in the very least). We all know what the 2nd Amendment says! "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!! It don't take legal interpretation or sack of shit judges to understand what it means! We have been played! These SOBs are disarming US to control US! They FEAR US, THEY FEAR FREEDOM & LIBERTY, more then they ever feared the terrorist themselves. We need our troops back here, back home to their families, back to our reality and being educated what treachery is happening right here at HOME! We need our brothers and sisters covering our Constitutional asses and RIGHTS...right NOW! America is on a hair trigger for Civil War and if you don't know that, you haven't been paying attention. #OATH NOT #NDAA
On Saturday, I informed you of a Connecticut police officer who said he wanted to bust through one patriot's door and take his guns. This morning I spoke with John Cinque via telephone and he provided me with screenshots of the conversation that he mentioned in the video. Many people wanted to see the evidence …
Though the NDAA is typically the vehicle chosen to fund our Armed Forces, it does not have to be. In an Op-Ed in the New York Times, two retired four star generals noted that the 2012 NDAA “can be vetoed without cutting financing for our troops,” and urged the President to do so. Indeed, a separate bill was introduced to fund the military, without the detention provisions in the 2012 NDAA, and that bill was voted down. Even more practically, if funding the military is as important to the Congressman as he claims, the entire text could simply be copied into a different bill since, like all budgetary bills, the NDAA begins in the House. It may require more votes, but if extra votes are what stands between your Congressman and your right to a trial he shouldn’t be in office.
“As a true Constitutional Conservative, I understand and have a great appreciation for the importance of protecting our right to privacy. When first examining the bill, one of my top priorities was to refuse supporting any type of program that trades our guaranteed civil liberties for the promise of security.
The issue that has raised some concern is a provision that stops President Obama from closing the prison in Guantanamo Bay and transferring over 150 terrorists to American soil or returning them to their home nations. This section of the bill, known commonly as the indefinite detention provision, specifically stipulates that it does not apply to U.S. citizens.“
REASON #1: Talking to the police CANNOT help you. If the police are talking to you, it’s because they suspect you have committed a crime. If they have detained you, it’s because they already have enough evidence to arrest you and they want to see if...
Randy L. Dixon Rivera's insight:
Under the #NDAA 2012 American citizens now can be indefinitely detained (held) anywhere in the world by U.S. Military authorities. Google it.