Contemplative Science
77
the science of meditation and other contemplative practices
Follow
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo onto Contemplative Science
Scoop.it!

The emergence of contemplative neuroscience | Mindful

The emergence of contemplative neuroscience | Mindful | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

This October, Richard Davidson, Ph.D., spoke at the Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education (CCARE) at Stanford University. Mindful.org posts the video (90 min) here - watch to hear Davidson speak about the early days of contemplative neuroscience, and how our understanding of the neural mechanisms and effects of meditation has evolved since then. He also discusses conceptual and methodological issues in the study of meditation, and perhaps most progressive - how to practice both science and dharma (Humility in science, anyone?). Explicit recommendations include: time for daily practice in the lab, time for extended retreats as part of graduate training, and collaborative conversations with contemplative scholars. 

No comment yet.
Your new post is loading...
Rescooped by Eileen Cardillo from Neuroscience - memory - learning - mindfulness
Scoop.it!

Interview with Robert Burton, author of A Skeptic's Guide to the Mind | Brain Science Podcast series

Interview with Robert Burton, author of A Skeptic's Guide to the Mind | Brain Science Podcast series | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

Brain Science podcast host, Ginger Campbell, MD, interviews Robert Burton, neurologist and writer on his latest book: "In On Being Certain: Believing You Are Right Even When You're Not Robert Burton showed that the feeling of certainty, which is something we all experience, has its origin in brain processes that are both unconscious and inaccessible to consciousness. Now in his new book A Skeptic's Guide to the Mind: What Neuroscience Can and Cannot Tell Us About Ourselves he extends these ideas to other mental sensations such as our feeling of agency and our sense of causation. The idea that much of what our brain does is not accessible to our conscious awareness is NOT new, but Dr. Burton considers the implications for our understanding of the mind." 

 

Summary of the book from Burton's website:

 

"A critical look at cutting edge and key assumptions in cognitive science that offers a new way of exploring how our brains generate thought. What if what we consider to be reason-based, deliberative judgment is really the product of involuntary mental sensations? In A Skeptic's Guide to the Mind, Dr. Robert Burton takes a close look at the key false assumptions that permeate the field of cognitive science and offers a new way of exploring how our brains generate thought. The essential paradox that drives this cutting-edge theory is that the same mechanisms that prevent understanding the mind also generate a sense that we can attain such understanding. In A Skeptic's Guide to the Mind, Burton presents his theory of the "mental sensory system"—a system that generates the main components of consciousness: a sense of self, a sense of choice and free will, and how we make moral decisions.

 

Bringing together anecdotes, practical thought experiments, and cutting-edge neuroscience to show how these various strands of thought and mental sensations interact, A Skeptic's Guide to the Mind offers a powerful tool for knowing what we can and cannot say about the mind; how to discern good from bad cognitive science studies; and most importantly, how to consider the moral implications of these studies. This is a pathbreaking model for considering the interaction between conscious and unconscious thought." (http://www.rburton.com)


Via David McGavock
Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Looks like I just found something to move to the top of my summer reading list. Burton's book seems an ideal companion text for the Science of Meditation course I teach. Although I appreciate the scope and scientific rigor of James Austin's books (Zen and the Brain, Selfless Insight, Meditating Selflessly), and have found them to be useful resources while planning and conceptualizing the course, the writing can be dense for non-scientists with the reported studies running together in their minds. Richard Hanson's The Buddha's Brain and Daniel Siegel's The Mindful Brain, however, feel too pop science light for graduate students (and, personally, I find the ambiguity of the non-technical glosses for nuanced or complex scientific concepts utterly confusing and/or frustrating).

 

For these reasons, I've organized the course almost exclusively around empircal studies published in top journals, providing the neuroscience background myself along the way. I am thinking to start suggesting Jamie Ward's Student's Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience as a resource/primer for those that want it, but Burton's book sounds like it might be useful for everyone.

 

For those that also teach in this area (if you're out there!), I'd love to hear what's worked for you.

Nancy Hepner's curator insight, May 24, 11:03 PM

Long arse article from a guy who still needs to learn about positive speaking and thinking. But interesting nonetheless hmmm?

Nancy Hepner's comment, May 24, 11:09 PM
Brain stimulating, however I already see some points where I disagree.
Randy Bauer's comment, Today, 1:03 AM
I am intrigued by this the book and will list it as a must read.
Rescooped by Eileen Cardillo from Genius
Scoop.it!

10,000 Hours May Not Make a Master After All | TIME.com

10,000 Hours May Not Make a Master After All | TIME.com | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

"There are many roads to greatness, but logging 10,000 hours of practice to help you perfect a skill may not be sufficient.

 

Based on research suggesting that practice is the essence of genius, best-selling author Malcolm Gladwell popularized the idea that 10,000 hours of appropriately guided practice was “the magic number of greatness,” regardless of a person’s natural aptitude. With enough practice, he claimed in his book Outliers, anyone could achieve a level of proficiency that would rival that of a professional. It was just a matter of putting in the time.

 

But in the years since Gladwell first pushed the “10,000-hours rule,” researchers have engaged in a spirited debate over what that rule entails. It’s clear that not just any practice, but only dedicated and intensive honing of skills that counts. And is there magic in that 10,000th hour?

 

In an attempt to answer some of these questions, and to delve further into how practice leads to mastery, Zach Hambrick, associate professor of psychology at Michigan State University, and his colleagues decided to study musicians and chess players. It helps that both skills are amenable to such analysis because players can be ranked almost objectively. So in their research, which was published in the journal Intelligence, they reanalyzed data from 14 studies of top chess players and musicians. They found that for musicians, only 30% of the variance in their rankings as performers could be accounted for by how much time they spent practicing. For chess players, practice only accounted for 34% of what determined the rank of a master player.

 

“We looked at the two most widely studied domains of expertise research: chess and music,” says Hambrick. “It’s clear from this data that deliberate practice doesn’t account for all, nearly all or even most of the variance in performance in chess and music.” Two-thirds of the difference, in fact, was unrelated to practice...."


Via Sandeep Gautam
Eileen Cardillo's insight:

I am surprised that people apparently commonly believe that practice alone might be sufficient to achieve mastery. Such self-flattery! I can only imagine the logic of such individuals: "Oh, if I only put in the hours, I could be just as good as Tiger Woods/Bobby Fischer/Mathieu Riccard/[Insert whoever is way better than you at something here]." Implication: I could achieve greatness, I just am too busy doing other things.

 

Let's be realistic. We are not [ahem] born blank slates. Our genetics predispose us to different cognitive, physical, and emotional aptitudes and weaknesses. Great teachers matter. So does having a supportive environment (whatever that may be, as it's likely to vary between individuals and the particular skill in question). 10,000 hours of practice is certainly going to have a significant impact on performance, but it's only one of the key ingredients. 

 

Evidence that practice is necessary, but not sufficient, is not reason for discouragement though. I agree with the author: "So whether you view the data as suggesting that practice is less important because it only accounts for one-third of the variability in proficiency, or more important because it explains more than any other factor discovered so far, is a matter of perspective."

 

 

Sandeep Gautam's curator insight, May 20, 2:49 PM

10,000 hours are important; so is identifying a domain that motivates you and where you have some basic talent!

Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Insular Cortex Mediates Increased Pain Tolerance in Yoga Practitioners | Cerebral Cortex

Insular Cortex Mediates Increased Pain Tolerance in Yoga Practitioners | Cerebral Cortex | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

ABSTRACT: Yoga, an increasingly popular discipline among Westerners, is frequently used to improve painful conditions. We investigated possible neuroanatomical underpinnings of the beneficial effects of yoga using sensory testing and magnetic resonance imaging techniques. North American yogis tolerated pain more than twice as long as individually matched controls and had more gray matter (GM) in multiple brain regions. Across subjects, insular GM uniquely correlated with pain tolerance. Insular GM volume in yogis positively correlated with yoga experience, suggesting a causal relationship between yoga and insular size. Yogis also had increased left intrainsular white matter integrity, consistent with a strengthened insular integration of nociceptive input and parasympathetic autonomic regulation. Yogis, as opposed to controls, used cognitive strategies involving parasympathetic activation and interoceptive awareness to tolerate pain, which could have led to use-dependent hypertrophy of insular cortex. Together, these findings suggest that regular and long-term yoga practice improves pain tolerance in typical North Americans by teaching different ways to deal with sensory inputs and the potential emotional reactions attached to those inputs leading to a change in insular brain anatomy and connectivity.

 

Villemure, C. et al (in press). Insular cortex mediates increased pain tolerance in yoga practitioners. Cerebral Cortex. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht124

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Can Meditation Change Your Genes?

Can Meditation Change Your Genes? | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

""CHANGE YOUR GENES! THROUGH MEDITATION!”

 

It really does sound like an infomercial, doesn’t it? Another gimmicky health ad from Ms. HydroxyCut or Mr. 5-Hour-Energy.  But before you roll your eyes, consider this.

 

It might be true.

 

Emerging research suggests a relationship between the practice of meditation and genetic changes.  Let’s consider the evidence."

 

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Aditi Nerurkar, MD, briefly summarizes four recent studies suggesting a causal relationship between meditation practice and changes in gene expression. The data are minimal at this point and connecting the dots between these changes and higher order physiological or psychological outcomes of practice is yet to come. Nonetheless, an exciting new line of research. Hopefully, we will be seeing more studies of this kind in the future.

Elena Ortés's comment, May 18, 4:00 AM
La casualidad de la causalidad ?=?=
Randy Bauer's comment, May 18, 10:47 AM
Eileen, what I was trying to emphasize was that science is only one step behind of taking a suggestion of a causal relation to providing definitive proof. It is up to science to put together the right methods. Thanks for bringing this site, and your insight to my attention.
Eileen Cardillo's comment, May 20, 10:34 AM
You're most welcome! I'm glad to hear it's useful to other folks. A scientific understanding of the mechanisms by which meditation has its influence is in its infancy, but I share your optimism that such knowledge is on the horizon already, yes!
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Contemplative Computing | Guardian

Contemplative Computing | Guardian | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

"What if there were a way to use the internet – and all our web-connected phones and tablets and laptops and games consoles – to foster rather than erode our attention spans, and to replace that sense of edgy distractedness with calm?

 

This is the question motivating the embryonic movement known variously as "calming technology", "the slow web", "conscious computing" or ([Alex] Pang's preferred term) "contemplative computing". Its members hope that we might be able to perform a sneaky bit of jujitsu on the devices that dominate our lives: to turn the agents of distraction into agents of serenity." Oliver Burkeman, essayist and author of The Antidote: Happiness for People Who Can't Stand Positive Thinking, investigates. 

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

I especially liked Burkeman's quote from Australian philosopher Damon Young - "To be diverted isn't simply to have too many stimuli but to be confused about what to attend to and why." Damon makes an important point here, one that resonates with a frequent conversation topic in meditation communities. The capacity to flexibly orient and steady attention is useless, maybe even harmful, when developed and applied in the absence of wisdom and ethics.  

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

What Does Science Teach Us About Well-Being?

What Does Science Teach Us About Well-Being? | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

Distinguished contemplative neuroscientist Richie Davidson on well-being: "It is my fervent aspiration that our culture will pay more attention to well-being, will include strategies to promote well-being with our educational curricula and within the healthcare arena, and will include well-being within our definitions of health. These changes would help to promote greater harmony and well-being of the planet." 

 

In this brief blog post, Davidson makes four claims about well-being: 

1. Well-being is a skill

2. Well-being is associated with specific patterns of brain activity that influence and are influenced by the body.

3. Equanimity and generoisty both contribute to well-being and are associated with distinct patterns of brain and bodily activity.

4. There is an innate disposition toward well-being and prosocial behavior.

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

For the most part, I agree with Davidson's summary here. However, in the final point he offers the following speculation about human inclination for pro-social behavior: "If this [research] indeed continues to be replicated across a wide range of cultures, it would invite the view that we come into the world with an innate preference for good and we obscure that innate propensity over the course of development as we become socialized within our modern culture."

 

I am not comfortable using language like "good" (nor its implied opposite, "evil") when describing nature, human or otherwise. Nor do I think the data are particularly compelling that we are biologically predisposed to either disposition. Humans, like other animals, are biologically predisposed to adaptive behaviors - actions that promote our survival and the replication of our DNA. As social mammals, these adaptive behaviors often pertain to how we act towards other members of our social group. These behaviors are neither good nor bad and such moral overtones say more about our wishes as people than our knowledge as scientists. Humans can be beastly, and I'd submit this disturbing reality often reflects our innate dispositions just as much as our benevolent behaviors might. 

 

For similar reasons I take issue with the translation of the three kilesas (greed, hatred, delusion) as the three "poisons" or "defilements". I think it is more productive, and accurate, to consider them more neutrally, in terms of, say, biological drives that contribute to afflictive states and/or do not promote well-being (but may nonetheless promote survival and reproduction). It's perfectly appropriate for language and religion scholars to translate them into English as closely as possible to what the Buddha intended. But as contemplative scientists, we need to be more flexible, translating them in ways that are more value neutral and empircally tractable. Conceptualizing the kilesas in terms of attachment, aversion, and ignorance or in terms of approach and avoidance behaviors seems preferable. Evolution does not concern itself with notions of good and evil; humans do. Scientists have a responsibility, at least when speaking as an authority on biology, not to conflate the two.

Martinez Hernandez's curator insight, May 12, 11:35 AM

Elementos que se deben de tomar en cuenta en la educación  hoy en día.

Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Yoga From a Scientific Perspective | NCCAM

Yoga From a Scientific Perspective | NCCAM | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

The 2007 National Health Interview Survey found that yoga is one of the top 10 complementary health approaches used among U.S. adults. An estimated 6 percent of adults used yoga for health purposes in the previous 12 months.

 

The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), a subdivision of the National Institute of Health (NIH), has compiled the following yoga-related resources of interest to consumers, health professionals, scientists, and other researchers:

 

- General Information

- Research Spotlights

- Ongoing Medical Studies

- Clinical Digests

- Scientific Literature Reviews

 

The website also features a 17 minute video considering yoga from a scientific perspective.

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Another great resource for contemplative researchers. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Daniel Dennett, Author of ‘Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking’ | New York Times

Daniel Dennett, Author of ‘Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking’ | New York Times | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

The philosopher Daniel Dennett talks about his 16th book, “Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking,” which W.W. Norton is publishing next week... 

 

The mind? A collection of computerlike information processes, which happen to take place in carbon-based rather than silicon-based hardware.

 

The self? Simply a “center of narrative gravity,” a convenient fiction that allows us to integrate various neuronal data streams.

 

The elusive subjective conscious experience — the redness of red, the painfulness of pain — that philosophers call qualia? Sheer illusion."

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Self as a "center of narrative gravity" and convenient fiction? I'm listening. Anattā on my mind, looking forward to this book from the thinker that almost inspired me to chase down a philosophy degree after becoming a scientist (One of my thesis advisors, Kim Plunkett, dissuaded me with the admonition that to do so would be self-indulgent at that point. Kim's advice never having steered me wrong, I pursued a postdoc instead...and made no time at all to read philosophy on my own. Nine years later and, finally!, finding time).

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Special Issue on Mindfulness Neuroscience | Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Special Issue on Mindfulness Neuroscience | Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

From Editorial by Yi-Yuan Tang and Michael I Posner: 

Mindfulness neuroscience is a new, interdisciplinary field of mindfulness practice and neuroscientific research; it applies neuroimaging techniques, physiological measures and behavioral tests to explore the underlying mechanisms of different types, stages and states of mindfulness practice over the lifespan. Mindfulness-based meditation (MBM) or mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) has been a hot topic in psychology, neuroscience, health care and education in recent years (Chiesa and Serretti, 2010;Holzel et al., 2011), and publications have been rapidly growing from only 28 in 2001 to 397 papers listed in ISI during 2011. Many studies indicate the positive effects of MBM or MBI and researchers explore the mechanisms (Lutz et al., 2008; Tang and Posner, 2009; Chiesa and Serretti, 2010; Holzel et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012a). However, the mechanisms of mindfulness practice are still poorly understood.

 

To improve the understanding of mindfulness mechanisms, we began a special issue on mindfulness neuroscience in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (SCAN) in the fall of 2010 and invited more than 20 leading research laboratories in this field from all over the world. In this special issue, we include 12 peer-reviewed empirical articles using neuroimaging to address neural mechanisms and clinical issues in mindfulness neuroscience. The articles in this special issue offer a sample of the cutting-edge discoveries being made at the frontier of mindfulness neuroscience.

 

Special Issue on Mindfulness Neuroscience in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. Vol 8, Issue 1, January 2013.

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

I know I have posted some of the individual articles presented here, but as I make my way through the rest of the issue, I thought the Table of Contents might be a handy post as well. My apologies if I've put this up already and forgotten. Spring weather is impairing my memory.  

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Database of Peer-Reviewed Contemplative Teaching and Learning Articles

Database of Peer-Reviewed Contemplative Teaching and Learning Articles | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

The Contemplative Teaching and Learning (CTL) Initiative of the Garrison

Institute has launched a searchable database of peer-reviewed

articles on K-12 contemplative education. A free, publicly accessible resource made possible by a generous grant from the 1440 Foundation, the database currently contains over 200 research articles, literature reviews, and construct validity studies. Initiative staff will continue to add new articles to maintain it as an up-to-date source of research in the field.

 

Users can search the database by several criteria that help identify the

studies that are most relevant to their work: author, journal, article

title and research focus (research on children and adolescents in schools,

research on children and adolescents in clinical settings, studies

involving teachers and research with parents).

 

Each article entry contains a complete APA citation, abstract and link to

the journal in which it was published. Whenever possible, a link to the

full text of the articles is also available.

 

The goal is to make the rapidly growing body of research on contemplative

education easier to find and access, and to give students and researchers a comprehensive yet focused collection of articles to promote further study and dialogue.

 

[Announcement from the MLRN Digest #52]

 
Eileen Cardillo's insight:

What a great resource!

Татьяна Фокина's curator insight, April 29, 2:00 AM

Инициатива по открытому доступу к статьям

Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

This is Your Brain on Meditation | Philadelphia Science Festival

This is Your Brain on Meditation | Philadelphia Science Festival | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

"This is Your Brain on Meditation: The Benefits of Mindfulness"

Denise Clegg, MAPP

Meditation and mindfulness practices have been associated
with a wide range of mental and physical benefits. But what is it about mindfulness and meditation that foster well-being and buffers against the adverse effects of stress, anxiety, and depression? A discussion about the growing body of research on this topic will be followed by a short, guided session of mindfulness meditation.

 

Speaker Bio: Denise Clegg, MAPP, is the Managing Director of the Penn Center for Neuroscience & Society (www.neuroethics.upenn.edu) and a mindfulness meditation facilitator at the University of Pennsylvania. Her work is dedicated to advancing research, programs, and policies that have a positive social impact.


Thursday, April 25, 6:00 p.m.

Franklin Square Park Pavilion, 200 N. 6th St., Philadelphia, PA 19106

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Philadelphia Science Festival! Meditation and Brains! My colleague across the hall!

 

[Translation: I recommend]

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Applications Open: The Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education summer institute

Applications Open: The Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education summer institute | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

The purpose of the CCARE Summer Research Institute, a six-day conference to be held in Summer 2013, is to advance research on compassion and altruism through collaboration, dialog, inquiry, education, and research.

 

Drawing from several disciplines including neuroscience, psychology, genetics, economics, and contemplative traditions, the CCARE Summer Research Institute aims to examine compassion, altruism and prosocial behavior from a wide perspective of scientific angles. In particular, the institute will explore and discuss the neural correlates, biological bases and antecedents of compassion; the effects of compassion on behavior, physiology, overall health, and the brain; and methods, techniques, and programs for cultivating compassion and promoting altruism within individuals and society-wide. Compassion education programs will also be integrated into the curriculum.The long-term goal of the Summer Research Institute is to support young scientists who wish to focus their research on compassion, altruism, and prosocial behavior. 

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Another reason to go: Like the Mind and Life Summer Research Institute held the month before, The CCARE Summer Research Institute offers competitive pilot grant funding to its participants. 

 

Applications open till April 15th. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Mindfulness from meditation associated with lower stress hormone

Mindfulness from meditation associated with lower stress hormone | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

"Focusing on the present rather than letting the mind drift may help to lower levels of the stress hormone cortisol, suggests new research from the Shamatha Project at the University of California...This is the first study to show a direct relation between resting cortisol and scores on any type of mindfulness scale," said Tonya Jacobs, a postdoctoral researcher at the UC Davis Center for Mind and Brain and first author of a paper describing the work."

 

ABSTRACT

Objective: Cognitive perseverations that include worry and rumination over past or future events may prolong cortisol release, which in turn may contribute to predisease pathways and adversely affect physical health. Meditation training may increase self-reported mindfulness, which has been linked to reductions in cognitive perseverations. However, there are no reports that directly link self-reported mindfulness and resting cortisol output. Here, the authors investigate this link. Methods: In an observational study, we measured self-reported mindfulness and p.m. cortisol near the beginning and end of a 3-month meditation retreat (N = 57). Results: Mindfulness increased from pre- to post-retreat.. Cortisol did not significantly change. However, mindfulness was inversely related to p.m. cortisol at pre-retreat.., and post-retreat.., controlling for age and body mass index. Pre to postchange in mindfulness was associated with pre to postchange in p.m. cortisol..Larger increases in mindfulness were associated with decreases in p.m. cortisol, whereas smaller increases (or slight decreases) in mindfulness were associated with an increase in p.m. cortisol. Conclusions: These data suggest a relation between self-reported mindfulness and resting output of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system...

 

Jacobs, T. et al. (in press). Self-reported mindfulness and resting cortisol in a Shamatha meditation retreat. Health Psychology. Advanced publication online. doi: 10.1037/a0031362

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Modest but interesting new findings to come out of the Shamatha Project, the most comprehensive long-term investigation to date of the physical and cognitive effects of meditation. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Real-time fMRI links subjective experience with brain activity during focused attention | NeuroImage

Real-time fMRI links subjective experience with brain activity during focused attention | NeuroImage | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

ABSTRACT:  Recent advances in brain imaging have improved the measure of neural processes related to perceptual, cognitive and affective functions, yet the relation between brain activity and subjective experience remains poorly characterized. In part, it is a challenge to obtain reliable accounts of participant's experience in such studies. Here we addressed this limitation by utilizing experienced meditators who are expert in introspection. We tested a novel method to link objective and subjective data, using real-time fMRI (rt-fMRI) to provide participants with feedback of their own brain activity during an ongoing task. We provided real-time feedback during a focused attention task from the posterior cingulate cortex, a hub of the default mode network shown to be activated during mind-wandering and deactivated during meditation. In a first experiment, both meditators and non-meditators reported significant correspondence between the feedback graph and their subjective experience of focused attention and mind-wandering. When instructed to volitionally decrease the feedback graph, meditators, but not non-meditators, showed significant deactivation of the posterior cingulate cortex. We were able to replicate these results in a separate group of meditators using a novel step-wise rt-fMRI discovery protocol in which participants were not provided with prior knowledge of the expected relationship between their experience and the feedback graph (i.e., focused attention versus mind-wandering). These findings support the feasibility of using rt-fMRI to link objective measures of brain activity with reports of ongoing subjective experience in cognitive neuroscience research, and demonstrate the generalization of expertise in introspective awareness to novel contexts.

 

Garrison, KA et al. (in press). Real-time fMRI links subjective experience with brain activity during focused attention. NeuroImage. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.030

 

Dr. Brewer gives an overview of the study in layman's terms here:

http://purehealth100.blogspot.com/2013/05/dr-judson-brewer-how-to-get-out-of-your.html (photo credit from this blogpost).

 

PDF of accepted manuscript available here:

http://evanthompsondotme.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/1-s2-0-s1053811913005247-main.pdf

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Ever since hearing Judson Brewer present results from this study at last year's International Symposium on Contemplative Science, I have eagerly awaited its publication. The use of real-time neural feedback during fMRI in order to facilitate meditation training is of tremendous theoretical value. fMRI is not practical as a widely available training tool, but this kind of data should significantly enhance our understanding of the mechanisms by which we acquire and sustain meditation states. In turn, this knowledge can be used to hone more accessible forms of neurofeedback for meditators (e.g. EEG).

 

This kind of research is also of interest to cognitive neuroscientists more widely. By so compellingly linking subjective mental states with ongoing neural activity, Garrison and colleagues elegantly demonstrate the feasibility and utility of a neurophenomonology approach. 

 

For background on the method, two reviews just came out:

 

Birbaumer, N. et al (in press). Learned regulation of brain metabolism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.009

 

Sulzer, J. et al (in press). Real-time fMRI neurofeedback: Progress and challenges. NeuroImage. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.033

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Brain can be trained in compassion - free download of trainings used in study

Brain can be trained in compassion - free download of trainings used in study | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

Until now, little was scientifically known about the human potential to cultivate compassion — the emotional state of caring for people who are suffering in a way that motivates altruistic behavior.

 

A new study by researchers at the Center for Investigating Healthy Minds at the Waisman Center of the University of Wisconsin-Madison shows that adults can be trained to be more compassionate. The report, recently published online in the journal Psychological Science, is the first to investigate whether training adults in compassion can result in greater altruistic behavior and related changes in neural systems underlying compassion.

 

"Our fundamental question was, 'Can compassion be trained and learned in adults? Can we become more caring if we practice that mindset?'" says Helen Weng, a graduate student in clinical psychology and lead author of the paper. "Our evidence points to yes."

 

..."It's kind of like weight training," Weng says. "Using this systematic approach, we found that people can actually build up their compassion 'muscle' and respond to others' suffering with care and a desire to help."

Compassion training was compared to a control group that learned cognitive reappraisal, a technique where people learn to reframe their thoughts to feel less negative. Both groups listened to guided audio instructions over the Internet for 30 minutes per day for two weeks. "We wanted to investigate whether people could begin to change their emotional habits in a relatively short period of time," says Weng.

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

I am linking to this write-up of Weng's compassion study again because a) it's a clear summary for those uninterested in reading the full research article or finding it behind a paywall and b) because the compassion training and cognitive re-appraisal training are available for free download from the Center for Investigating Healthy Minds' website (http://investigatinghealthyminds.org/compassion.html). 

 

Weng and colleagues observed neural changes associated with more altruistic behavior after 30 minutes of daily compassion meditation - after only two weeks of practice. If you've never tried compassion meditations or are looking for a fresh incentive, here you go.

 

Methods sections of meditation papers generally do not provide sufficient detail to get a clear sense of exactly what kind of meditation practice participants were asked to do, let alone to replicate the meditation instructions. Making their meditation trainings easily available is good for interested readers, and good for science, too.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Compassion Training Alters Altruism and Neural Responses to Suffering | Psychological Science

Compassion Training Alters Altruism and Neural Responses to Suffering | Psychological Science | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

ABSTRACT: Compassion is a key motivator of altruistic behavior, but little is known about individuals’ capacity to cultivate compassion through training. We examined whether compassion may be systematically trained by testing whether (a) short-term compassion training increases altruistic behavior and (b) individual differences in altruism are associated with training-induced changes in neural responses to suffering. In healthy adults, we found that compassion training increased altruistic redistribution of funds to a victim encountered outside of the training context. Furthermore, increased altruistic behavior after compassion training was associated with altered activation in brain regions implicated in social cognition and emotion regulation, including the inferior parietal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and in DLPFC connectivity with the nucleus accumbens. These results suggest that compassion can be cultivated with training and that greater altruistic behavior may emerge from increased engagement of neural systems implicated in understanding the suffering of other people, executive and emotional control, and reward processing.

 

Weng, H.Y. et al. (in press). Compassion training alters altruism and neural responses to suffering. Psychological Science. doi: 10.1177/0956797612469537

 

Picture credit: Doug Savage, Savage Chickens.

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

University of Wisconsin-Madison does more standards-setting work. Most notably, they used an active control group of comparable quality and rigor and in their analyses linked behavior outside the scanner to neural activity during a different task. Bonus: the lead author, Helen Weng, is a graduate student.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Emotion regulation choice: Selecting between cognitive regulation strategies to control emotion | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Emotion regulation choice: Selecting between cognitive regulation strategies to control emotion | Frontiers in Human Neuroscience | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

"Consider the anger that arises in a heated argument with your romantic partner, or the dreadful anxious anticipation in the dentist's waiting room prior to a root canal procedure. Our daily lives are densely populated with events that make us emotional. Luckily, however, we developed numerous ways to control or regulate our emotions in order to adapt (Gross, 2007;Koole, 2009 for reviews). A central remaining challenge to explain adaptation, involves understanding how individuals choose between the different emotion regulation strategies in order to fit with differing situational demands. Specifically, when is the aforementioned romantic partner or dental patient more likely to “put aside” or disengage from the emotional situation, and when are they more likely to “make sense” or engage with their emotional reactions?

 

In this opinion article we concentrate on the intersection between affective science and decision making as manifested in emotion regulation choice, defined as the act of making an autonomous choice between different regulation strategies that are available in a particular context."

 

Sheppes, G. & Levin, Z. (in press). Emotion regulation choice: Selecting between cognitive regulation strategies to control emotion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00179

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

A valuable, clear read for anyone aiming to translate Buddhist concepts into language familiar to cognitive psychologists (or vice verse). The article focuses on deliberate regulatory choices at early and late stages of emotion processing - i.e. distraction, which entails disengaging attention from emotional information versus reappraisal, which involves intentional engagement with emotional information coupled with reinterpretation of its meaning. This same contrast is of central relevance and familiarity to meditators, although the authors do not reference this particular context. Their conclusion, however, could just as well have been a segue to discussing emotion regulation in meditators: "Central factors such as prior practice with choosing regulation strategies in different situations, strong motivational forces to perform one strategy over another and a general central executive ability that allows efficient information processing may all influence regulatory choices."

Shubham Tyagi's curator insight, May 23, 1:49 PM

I still have to read it... very long but intersting

Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Contemplating David Foster Wallace's "This Is Water"

Contemplating David Foster Wallace's "This Is Water" | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

A clever film adaptation of David Foster Wallace's commencement speech to the 2005 graduating class of Kenyon College went viral this week (http://www.theglossary.com/). The filmmakers, known as The Glossary, comment, ”the resulting speech didn’t become widely known until 3 years later, after his tragic death. It is, without a doubt, some of the best life advice we’ve ever come across, and perhaps the most simple and elegant explanation of the real value of education.” The video is an abridged version of the full speech, which The Wall Street Journal, among others, published after his death in 2008 (click the fish pic for the full text - well worth it). With 2.5 million hits on Youtube in 4 days, the Glossary's film and DFW's words have resonated with a diversity of people, many of whom recognize similar themes from their study of Buddhism and/or meditation. 

 

DFW reflects, for instance, "As I'm sure you guys know by now, it is extremely difficult to stay alert and attentive instead of getting hypnotized by the constant monologue inside your own head. Twenty years after my own graduation, I have come gradually to understand that the liberal-arts cliché about "teaching you how to think" is actually shorthand for a much deeper, more serious idea: "Learning how to think" really means learning how to exercise some control over how and what you think. It means being conscious and aware enough to choose what you pay attention to and to choose how you construct meaning from experience." 

 

Of our treasured, tortured "freedom to be lords of our own tiny skull-sized kingdoms, alone at the centre of all creation," he concludes: "This kind of freedom has much to recommend it. But there are all different kinds of freedom, and the kind that is most precious you will not hear much talked about in the great outside world of winning and achieving and displaying. The really important kind of freedom involves attention, and awareness, and discipline, and effort, and being able truly to care about other people and to sacrifice for them, over and over, in myriad petty little unsexy ways, every day. That is real freedom."

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Happy Weekend, interwebs. Feel free.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Now Accepting Submissions: The Journal of Contemplative Inquiry

Now Accepting Submissions: The Journal of Contemplative Inquiry | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

The Journal of Contemplative Inquiry is a new peer-reviewed, scholarly journal for all those who design, research, teach, and assess contemplative and introspective methods and practices in college and university settings. Contemplative and introspective practices cultivate a critical, first-person focus and create new opportunities for students to engage with course material. TheJournal promotes the understanding, development, and application of these methods in order to serve a vision of higher education as an opportunity for cultivating personal and social awareness and an exploration of meaning, purpose and values.

 

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

The Compassionate Mind | Observer

The Compassionate Mind | Observer | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

Decades of clinical research has focused and shed light on the psychology of human suffering. That suffering, as unpleasant as it is, often also has a bright side to which research has paid less attention: compassion. Human suffering is often accompanied by beautiful acts of compassion by others wishing to help relieve it. What is compassion and how is it different from empathy or altruism? Is it learned? What are its psychological and physical benefits? Can it be cultivated? 

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

The majority of research on meditation has pertained either to its physiological/clinical benefits or to its impact on attention. Research about its influence on emotion regulation and utility for cultivating pro-social states, like compassion, is now starting to catch up. This APS article is a good, non-technical review of the latter.

Randy Bauer's comment, May 18, 11:07 AM
Thanks again Eileen. I have recently read more on positive health and well-being, specifically Flourish by Seligman. Our well-being is greatly impacted my many things in our live's, and action that provides greater meaning beyond self(compassion) influences other aspects of our Well-Being(positive emotion,relationships). This too may have a physiological effect on not just inflammation, but telomere length.
Randy Bauer's curator insight, May 18, 11:10 AM

I have recently read more on positive health and well-being, specifically Flourish by Seligman. Our well-being is greatly impacted my many things in our live's, and action that provides greater meaning beyond self(compassion) influences other aspects of our Well-Being (positive emotion,relationships). This too may have a physiological effect on not just inflammation, but telomere length

(refer to http://aditinerurkar.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/can-meditation-change-your-genes/)

Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Meditation Health Benefits: What the Practice Does to Your Body

Meditation Health Benefits: What the Practice Does to Your Body | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

"We hear it all the time: Meditation can improve our creative thinking, our energy, stress levels and even our success...

 

Studies show that meditation is associated with improvement in a variety of psychological areas, including stress, anxiety, addiction, depression, eating disorders and cognitive function, among others. There's also research to suggest that meditation can reduce blood pressure, pain response, stress hormone levels and even cellular health. But what does it actually do to the body?"

 

 

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Meditation is not a panacea, and may be contraindicated in certain populations or contexts. Nonetheless, its demonstrated benefits are diverse and significant. This article doesn't tell us anything we didn't already know, but I like its infographic.   

Henrietta Marcella Menzies's curator insight, May 1, 10:52 AM

Great visual showing the health benefits of Meditation. We all need ways of managing anxiety, stress (and list goes on) because of the often break-neck pace we are accustom to at work. This article serves as a great reminder.

Randy Bauer's curator insight, May 12, 10:51 PM

Meditation can effectively change our emotions and physiological functions. A true Mind and Body Connection. This connectedness gives feedback that is vital to regulatory function of balance. Our Health is a constant balancing act.

Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

On Borges, Particles and the Paradox of the Perceived | The Stone, New York Times

On Borges, Particles and the Paradox of the Perceived | The Stone, New York Times | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it
How can science, philosophy and a work of pure imagination meet to deepen our understanding of the physical world?

 

Referring to a character in a Jorge Luis Borges' short story, philosopher William Eggington comments, "What [Borges' character] Funes shows is that, at its most basic level, any observation requires a synthesis of impressions over time. Furthermore, the process by which the synthesis takes place, the media through which it is processed, and the entity doing the synthesizing are all essential aspects of the knowledge being produced. This is, in a nutshell, the first part of Kant’s 1781 opus magnum, “The Critique of Pure Reason.” ...Kant’s insight was that, in order for the knowledge we get from our senses at any given moment in time to mean anything, our mindsmust already be distinguishing it and combining it with the information we get in prior and subsequent moments in time. Thusthere is no such thing as a pure impression in time — no absolute, frozen moment in which we know the sun is rising now without being able to infer anything from it — because such a pure moment without a before or after would be nothing at all." 

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Science, philosophy, fiction -- and the Buddhist Pali Canon? I cannot read this without thinking of the Sabba sutta ("The All") and recent conversations at the Won Institute regarding the ineluctable influence of previous experience and concepts on present-moment interpretations of sensory input. My teenage enchantment with Borges anticipated my adult curiosities more explicitly than I realized. 

 

Sabba sutta: http://tinyurl.com/clep88n

Татьяна Фокина's curator insight, April 30, 12:03 AM

О сенсорной информации

Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

Loving-Kindness Meditation Practice Associated with Longer Telomeres in Women | Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Loving-Kindness Meditation Practice Associated with Longer Telomeres in Women | Brain, Behavior, and Immunity | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

ABSTRACT: Relatively short telomere length may serve as a marker of accelerated aging, and shorter telomeres have been linked to chronic stress. Specific lifestyle behaviors that can mitigate the effects of stress might be associated with longer telomere lengths. Previous research suggests a link between behaviors that focus on the well-being of others, such as volunteering and caregiving, and overall health and longevity. We examined relative telomere length in a group of individuals experienced in Loving-Kindness Meditation (LKM), a practice derived from the Buddhist tradition which utilizes a focus on unselfish kindness and warmth towards all people, and control participants who had done no meditation. Blood was collected by venipuncture, and Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes. Quantitative real time PCR was used to measure relative telomere length (RTL) (Cawthon, 2002) in fifteen LKM practitioners and 22 control participants. There were no significant differences in age, gender, race, education, or exposure to trauma, but the control group had a higher mean body mass index (BMI) and lower rates of past depression. The LKM practitioners had longer RTL than controls at the trend level (p=.083); among women, the LKM practitioners had significantly longer RTL than controls, (p=.007), which remained significant even after controlling for BMI and past depression. Although limited by small sample size, these results offer the intriguing possibility that LKM practice, especially in women, might alter RTL, a biomarker associated with longevity.

 

Hoge, E. A. et al (in press). Loving-Kindness meditaiton practice associated with longer telomeres in women. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. Advance online publication doi: 10.1016/j.bbi/2013.04.005

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Although the sample size is small and the reasons as yet unknown, the gender difference reported in this study is intriguing. I can't recall similar findings in studies of FA and OM practices. In the authors' words: "We could also speculate that LKM practice leads to greater psychological, and therefore physiological, changes in women because they are able to utilize it better due to inherently greater empathic abilities or a greater focus on others; this potential difference in empathic capacity is supported by neuroimaging data showing stronger neural activation in women in emotion-related areas across several empathy tasks (emotion recognition, perspective taking and affective responsiveness) (Derntl et al., 2010)." One of the skills of experienced meditation teachers is the determination of which practices best suit which individuals according to temperament, lifestyle, current mental/physical issues, etc. It's encouraging to see that science is starting to illuminate the mechanisms by which different practices affect individual practitioners differently. 

No comment yet.
Rescooped by Eileen Cardillo from Empathy and Compassion
Scoop.it!

Meditation boosts compassion - new research from Northeastern University

Meditation boosts compassion - new research from Northeastern University | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

"Med­i­ta­tion is asso­ci­ated with a slew of health ben­e­fits including improved mental health, better func­tional cog­ni­tion, and even increased gray matter in the brain. His­tor­i­cally, though, one of the main pur­poses of med­i­ta­tion has been to increase the practitioner’s com­pas­sion toward all sen­tient beings, according to psychology professor David DeSteno. 

 

Nonethe­less, the social impli­ca­tions of med­i­ta­tion have never been sci­en­tif­i­cally studied. “We know med­i­ta­tion improves a person’s own phys­ical and psy­cho­log­ical well-being,” said Paul Condon, a grad­uate stu­dent in DeSteno’s lab. “We wanted to know whether it actu­ally increases com­pas­sionate behavior.”

 

In a new study led by Condon, DeSteno’s team in the Social Emotion Group showed that even a brief period of med­i­ta­tion training is indeed enough to boost one’s com­pas­sion toward a suf­fering stranger more than five­fold. The results will soon be pub­lished in the journal Psy­cho­log­ical Sci­ence.."


Via Edwin Rutsch
Eileen Cardillo's insight:

This study seems of interest for two reasons: 1) it considers compassionate behavior in a more ecologically valid way than behavioral experiments to date, and 2) the increased probability of a compassionate response was observed in meditators who both did and did not have compassion explicitly integrated into their training. This latter effect indicates that attention training is sufficient to increase pro-social behavior. No special affective or ethical instruction was necessary to change participants' social norms; rather, the change fell naturally out of the attention practice.

 

Data of this sort suggests that explicit ethical training (sila) may not be necessary to elicit increased pro-social behavior, an important finding for those (like me) interested in teaching meditation in a secular fashion. My working hypothesis is that changes in ethical behavior and values are a predictable byproduct of the cultivation of attention and awareness, a lawful relationship that is highly probable even if not absolute. In western psychology we distinguish detached, cognitive capacities like attention from affective, value-laden ones like compassion or empathy. Perhaps, however, awareness is the real backbone of moral character, scaffolding the emergence of pro-social traits like compassion.  I look forward to reading the actual paper when it's out and, fingers crossed, seeing it replicated and extended. 

No comment yet.
Scooped by Eileen Cardillo
Scoop.it!

The science behind meditation, and why it makes you feel better

The science behind meditation, and why it makes you feel better | Contemplative Science | Scoop.it

"Meditation yields a surprising number of health benefits, including stress reduction, improved attention, better memory, and even increased creativity and feelings of compassion. But how can something as simple as focusing on a single object produce such dramatic results? Here’s what the growing body of scientific evidence is telling us about meditation and how it can change the way our brains function."

Eileen Cardillo's insight:

Non-technical, brief overview. Pros: no background in science or meditation necessary. Cons: selective treatment, simplifies the literature. Bottomline: Easy Saturday morning reading while you're sipping your coffee not yet motivated to sit today.

No comment yet.