As a life-long learner, I have appreciated engaging and interacting with a wide variety of educators in a few Massively ...
Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
Your new post is loading...
Carlos Lizarraga Celaya's curator insight,
May 8, 11:39 AM
In 2011, the respective roles of higher education institutions and students worldwide were brought into question by the rise of the massive open online course (MOOC). MOOCs are defined by signature characteristics that include: lectures formatted as short videos combined with formative quizzes; automated assessment and/or peer and self–assessment and an online forum for peer support and discussion. Although not specifically designed to optimise learning, claims have been made that MOOCs are based on sound pedagogical foundations that are at the very least comparable with courses offered by universities in face–to–face mode. To validate this, we examined the literature for empirical evidence substantiating such claims. Although empirical evidence directly related to MOOCs was difficult to find, the evidence suggests that there is no reason to believe that MOOCs are any less effective a learning experience than their face–to–face counterparts. Indeed, in some aspects, they may actually improve learning outcomes. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Carlos Lizarraga Celaya's curator insight,
May 10, 12:48 PM
Instructivism is definitely more teacher and institutionally centered, where policy-makers and “power-holders” create processes, resource-pools, and conditions for success. Constructivism sees the teacher step aside to a new role as facilitator, pairing students with peers, learning processes, and another another at key moments based on data and observation while the students create their own knowledge and even early learning pathways. Connectivism is similar to constructivism–in fact, a learner participating in connectivism would likely do so at times with an constructivist approach. The difference here lies in the central role of relationships and networks in connectivism. Rather than supplemental, they are primary sources. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Ken Ronkowitz's curator insight,
May 4, 2:40 PM
perhaps not the "ultimate" but a good short introduction
Marci Segal, MS's curator insight,
May 5, 8:26 AM
A good intro to MOOC's. Next best thing in education? Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Anne Whaits's curator insight,
May 1, 10:44 PM
It is my view that one of the most significant statements made by George Siemens is this one: "As knowledge continues to grow and evolve, access to what is needed is more important than what the learner currently possesses."
The role of teaching (and learning) then needs to shift in several ways to support this. How do we support students in selecting, discerning, organising this information and critically reflecting on it? How do we support students in creating new ways of evidencing their learning? How do we encourage students to create content themselves that adds to this growing and evolving abundance of information and knowledge generation?
"The Network is the Learning"....another of George Siemens' statements that resonates so well with me.
Carlos Castaño's comment,
May 10, 10:08 AM
Quizá no sea aún una teoría del aprendizaje en sentido estricto del término, pero su influencia es innegable. Es, sin duda, un intento de articular una teoría del aprendizaje que entiende la Red. Y ese es el mejor comienzo
Carlos Lizarraga Celaya's curator insight,
May 10, 12:46 PM
Connectivism is the integration of principles explored by chaos, network, and complexity and self-organization theories. In a knowledge economy, the flow of information is the equivalent of the oil pipe in an industrial economy… The pipe is more important than the content within the pipe. Our ability to learn what we need for tomorrow is more important than what we know today. A real challenge for any learning theory is to actuate known knowledge at the point of application. When knowledge, however, is needed, but not known, the ability to plug into sources to meet the requirements becomes a vital skill. As knowledge continues to grow and evolve, access to what is needed is more important than what the learner currently possesses. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
systerwoody's curator insight,
April 23, 10:42 AM
Interestingly, ALT is out of U.K. http://www.alt.ac.uk/about-alt & they also offer CMALT, certified membership 'alt' scheme for learning technologists. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
Carlos Lizarraga Celaya's curator insight,
May 10, 12:49 PM
Learning basic digital skills through use of a network is somewhat of a contradiction. Hence, I have commented on Siemens’s key principles in the context of this most fundamental learning in a networked world. In the developing world, the most basic of digital skills (keyboard, mouse, logging on etc.) have to be learned before more valuable skills (searching, publishing) can be developed. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Kamakshi Rajagopal's comment,
April 23, 5:14 PM
Hi Minter Dial! We are conducting a survey on education-related topics on Scoop.IT at the Open Universiteit in the Netherlands and could really use your help. Would you like to join our experiment? You can sign up here: http://bit.ly/14QR9oa Thanks for your participation!!!
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|