Leaving the UK would create "a number of costs and uncertainties" for business with "fewer, more uncertain benefits", a report has concluded.
The suggestion from some quarters that the convenience of business operators should take precedence over the fundamental issue of constitutional justice is something that I find both insulting and ludicrous. We are talking about the status of a nation here. The idea that this should be conditional on satisfying the self-serving demands of profit-takers is utterly nonsensical.
Having said that, business people are obviously entitled to offer their opinion. It is a question of whose opinion we should afford most weight. In this regard, there are some notable differences between those business people who support independence and those who see their interests best served by keeping Scotland bound to the union.
While those opposing independence talk only of the supposed costs to their businesses, pro-independence business people tend to talk in terms of the benefits of independence to the country as a whole.
While the anti-independence faction in the business community obsesses about "uncertainty" in a way tat suggests they doubt their ability to cope with change, people such as Ivan McKee and the hundreds of other business people who have joined Business for Scotland convey enthusiasm and optimism and an eagerness to embrace change. One side talks of problems and pitfalls while the other talks of opportunities and potential.
I know which ones I want as Scotland's "business leaders".