Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
|
Rescooped by Miloš Bajčetić from E-Learning and Online Teaching onto Learning & Mind & Brain |
Scoop.it!
Kay Lehmann and Lisa Chamberlin the outstanding online instructors who teach the University of Wisconsin Stout's Creating Collaborative Communities in E-learning, created a one-stop page for advice and tips on: Time Management Strategies for Online Instructors.
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
 Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
I love my smartphone. It provides immediate information I need to run my busy life. But, there is a downside to constant connectivity for me and for society: the death of reflection.
Being hyper-connected—and agitated when not—means losing those precious moments when disparate ideas merge, when pleasant memories bring joy, and when pondering a problem leads to innovation. Accessing and using too much information all the time stifles reflection and all of its benefits.
Fitness, I believe, offers the solution of listening to one’s body, which is the antithesis of the quantified-self movement in which everything is tracked. When I run, I can feel last night’s overindulgence at dinner or, equally, last night’s eight hours of sleep. But all the devices to track where I am, my pace, or the comparison to my “friends” or my last run, distract me from the reflective process that often leads to great work after my run.
It’s not just when I run. It is all those moments waiting for an elevator or standing in line when I check my email, see if anyone has mentioned me on Twitter, or make my next “Words with Friends” move.
Letting one’s mind wander and reflecting on both one’s internal thoughts and feelings and the external world leads to great ideas—and by that I don’t mean just new and better devices.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
There is an issue, which may or may not be a problem for universities around the world, but that is certainly gaining a lot of attention in Britain and the United States—namely, attention itself.
Students increasingly arrive at university having grown up in a world in which their habits of study are heavily influenced by new media. They are used to media acting as a continuous stream of content that is more like a river of images than a page of text. According to one account, that means much shorter attention spans, much greater attention to visual modes of understanding, greater modulation of time, more and more reliance on interfaces, and so on. (See, most recently, Stephen Apkon’s The Age of the Image.) Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
I’m in the final week of a Coursera MOOC, Sports & Societythat for the most part has been lackluster and disappointing. I expected a university level course that would provide learning and perspectives into the social and cultural dimensions that affect sports participation and perceptions across different cultures. It missed the mark. Granted, the majority of Coursera courses are ‘lite’ versions of the real thing [full college course] – few mimic the workload or rigor of the face-to-face counterparts, which is fine [even preferred when taken for personal development] given the courses are not promoted as such.
Though a lite version does not mean that meaningful and deep learning cannot occur. I’ve completed two other Coursera courses, Introduction to Sociology, and E-learning and Digital Cultures. Both courses provided rich learning with scholarly materials, challenging assignments and opportunities to gain knowledge beyond the course site. Though the Sports & Society course wasn’t completely inadequate, in fact some things were done well, but for all the effort and resources that went into the course, it missed the mark quite significantly in terms of providing conditions for meaningful learning to occur. I see an opportunity to share here with readers what contributed to a mediocre MOOC learning experience. To provide an illustrative framework for this review, I’ve created a MOOC quality scorecard review, that is [loosely] based on a quality scorecard approach and my course design experience.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
When I first started in Instructional Design, the process was pretty top down: instructors gave the designer all of the content and they went to work in their secret bat caves to get it all ready to go online. That model worked for the time, but it took quite a while and instructors were often unable to help students with some issues simply because they were not part of the design process. As time went on, more control was given to instructors in the design phase and the role of instructional designer shifted from producer to guide or teacher. This gave rise to the Do-It-Yourself Designer/Instructor. In some places, this was always the case, but in other places this is becoming more of the norm. But as a trained ID, I see many flavors of DIY IDs committing the same basic design mistakes. Here are my top five – although this list could easily expand past these. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
We’ve certainly come a long way but some things seem hauntingly similar to many years ago. For example, Thomas Edison said in 1925 that “books will soon be obsolete in schools. Scholars will soon be instructed through the eye.” I’m pretty sure this is exactly what people are saying these days about the iPad.
Via Nik Peachey 
Peg Becksvoort's comment,
Today, 12:11 PM
Interesting to listen to B.F. Skinner talk about the machine for learning. He talks about the student moving at "his" own pace. This is, no surprise, the differentiated or Mass Customized Learning precursor.
Peg Becksvoort's curator insight,
Today, 12:12 PM
Watch B.F. Skinner talk about the learning machine. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
Best free downloadable and web-based video conferencing tools for holding multi-party video calls Via Robin Good, Juhani Pihkala, Timo Ilomäki, Juergen Wagner 
Patricia Daniels's comment,
June 8, 9:42 AM
Thanks for this comprehensive list. I teach via Skype and use Google hangout and Facetime with some students, friends and uni; colleagues. I don't know why more isn't made of these tools. Saves time and money. Any many of them are great for collaborative work.
Patricia Daniels's curator insight,
June 8, 9:50 AM
A very comprehensive list here of video conferencing tools. I use Skype to teach English as a second language but fallback on Google Hangout and Facetime if we have any technical issues. Not that I've had any issues with Skype, but more my connection when I'm travelling.
When I've got some extra time I'm going to work my way through this list as I see there are a couple that don't require signing in, or downloading of software, which is useful when you want to communicate synchronously with people who are suspicious about logging in to any tools or who don't have the capacity for extra downloads. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
Sorry for the light posting here, but I’m immersed in writing my book – Teaching Machines – which is due out late 2013/early 2014 (I hope).
However, the news of this past week has been fairly distracting from that project: revelations about the US government’s massive spying programs that include the monitoring of all our telephony metadata, as well as our usage of many popular technology sites. Verizon. Google. YouTube. Apple. Microsoft. Skype. Yahoo. Facebook.
My worries here aren’t simply about the sanctity of the US Constitution (although, god yes, there’s that). Nor are my education-related concerns that schools have been outsourcing many of their IT functions – hardware and software – to these very companies (although, god yes, there’s that too).
My book examines the history of education technologies and our long-running drive to automate teaching and learning. Pressey’s teaching machines of the 1920s. Skinner’s teaching machines of the 1950s. Radio, television, and YouTube broadcast of lectures and lessons. Intelligent tutoring systems. Khan Academy and its millions of lessons delivered. Adaptive learning tools. MOOCs. Massive student data collection. Artificial intelligence. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
MOOCs are, and will be, big business, and the way that their makers see profitability at the end of the tunnel is what gives them their particular shape. … the MOOCs which are now being developed by Silicon Valley startups … aim to do exactly the same thing that traditional courses have always done -transfer course content from expert to student - only to do so massively more cheaply and on a much larger scale. … MOOCs are simply a new way of maintaining the status quo, of re-institutionalizing higher education in an era of budget cuts, skyrocketing tuition, and unemployed college graduates burdened by student debt. … the California legislature proposes to solve a real systemic crisis - collapsing public resources, diminishing affordability, and falling completion rates in the state’s higher education system - by sending its students to MOOCs. … If this bill passes, the winners will be Silicon Valley and the austerity hawks in the California legislature … To put it quite bluntly, MOOCs are a speculative bubble, a product being pumped up and overvalued by pro-business government support and a lot of hot air in the media. Like all speculative bubbles—especially those that originate in Silicon Valley—it will eventually burst. Via Peter B. Sloep 
Peter B. Sloep's curator insight,
June 10, 11:31 AM
This article does not really sing a song that is much different from the song sung by many other opponents of MOOCs. However, it does so quite elegantly and forcefully. For that reason alone it is worth reading.
MOOC proponents have never shied away from making bold predications, like Sebastian Thrun who predicted that "Fifty years from now there will be only 10 institutions in the whole world that deliver higher education" (http://tiny.cc/83ygyw). Aaron faces them squarely when he claims that "MOOCs are a speculative bubble … [which] will eventually burst". I would hope it does, in the way he describes them as affecting Californian HE. I hope too, though, that the discovery of distance teaching that MOOCs exemplify, has a lasting effect, by making people reflect on the pedagogy, organisation and economics of (higher) education. (@pbsloep) Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
The dramatic increase in online education, particularly Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), presents researchers, academics, administrators, learners, and policy makers with a range of questions as to the effectiveness of this format of teaching and learning. To date, the impact of MOOCs and emerging forms of digital learning has been largely disseminated through press releases and university reports, with only limited peer-reviewed research publication. The proliferation of MOOCs in higher education requires a concerted and urgent research agenda.
The MOOC Research Initiative (MRI) will fill this research gap by evaluating MOOCs and how they impact teaching, learning, and education in general. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
Issue number 33 of eLearning Papers focuses on the challenges and future of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), a trend in education that has skyrocketed since 2008. […] Among other topics, eLearning Papers 33 explores whether MOOCs may be a viable solution for education in developing countries and analyses the role of these emerging courses in the education system, especially in higher education. Furthermore, valuable examples from the field are presented, such as the quad-blogging concept and a game-based MOOC developed to promote entrepreneurship education. Via Susan Bainbridge, Peter B. Sloep 
Gina Anderson CEO Mopi16 's curator insight,
May 13, 8:19 AM
We are going to see research in the next 3-5 years coming in about the beneficts and challenges of MOOC's. Interesting to me are the business models. Great marketing tool for those who have a current base of clients.
Peter B. Sloep's curator insight,
June 6, 2:34 AM
I have little to add to this other than that the collection of papers provides a distinctive European perspective on MOOCs. As a consequence (?), the focus is more on the pedagogy than on the economics of higher education (@pbsloep) Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
A brief description of Complex Adaptive Systems and
Via Bernard Ryefield, Ben van Lier, luiy, Rui Guimarães Lima 
luiy's curator insight,
June 5, 8:19 AM
Complex adaptive systems are all around us. Most things we take for granted are complex adaptive systems, and the agents in every system exist and behave in total ignorance of the concept but that does not impede their contribution to the system. Complex Adaptive Systems are a model for thinking about the world around us not a model for predicting what will happen. I have found that in nearly all situations I can view what is happening in Complex Adaptive Systems terms and that this opens up a variety of new options which give me more choice and more freedom. 
Alexander Abramov's curator insight,
June 6, 1:35 AM
Complex Adaptive Systems - underlie manipulated in biology and engineering, this feedback system. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (www.irrodl.org) is a refereed e-journal that aims to advance research, theory and best practice in open and distance education research.
IRRODL special issue - Open Educational Resources: Opening Access to Knowledge." Contents are mostly from authors working in three of the world’s leading open universities, namely the OU UK, Athabasca University, and the Dutch Open University Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
Coursera describes itself as a "education company that partners with the top universities and organizations in the world to offer courses online for anyone to take, for free." … If Coursera is selling courseware to universities, what exactly are they selling? Via Peter B. Sloep
Peter B. Sloep's curator insight,
June 2, 5:12 AM
Justin Reich then uses a taxonomy of learning management systems (LMSs) pioneered by John Richards (http://tiny.cc/wjj1xw) to clarify the question he asks. I must admit that the distinctions he makes are not entirely clear to me, but this is how I understand them. The first kind is your typical LMS (or VLE in the UK?), a platform for course development, such as Moodle or Blackboard. To me, they are an example of a substitutive technology, they provide alternative means of doing what people used to do already. As the name Blackboard aptly illustrates, traditional LMSs by and large conserve lecture-based teaching in classes, and only add alternative means to make learning materials available and add additional communication channels. The second kind Justin describes are self-contained online courses, with PLATO as an example (for those who still know this system). Here, there's no need for a teacher, they allow for fully independent learning, and to the user the technology (platform) and content blend seamlessly. This is an example of a transformative technology as it upsets dominant modes of teaching and learning. The third kind, which Justin dubs a digital teaching platform, sits in the middle: "This is a learning management system that is pre-populated with content and learning objects, but designed to be used by students in a classroom with a teacher." The punch line is that Coursera (and presumably the other MOOC providers too) are trying to be all three at the same time. Although this is new, Justin wonders whether such a hardly focused strategy will work.
My understanding of what Coursera cs are trying to do is different, though. To me, MOOC providers are essentially providers of a technological platform (compare a 2011 blog post by George Siemens - http://tiny.cc/8mm1xw - who discusses a similar notion). They provide a comprehensive and consolidated set of tools and technologies that not only afford a hopefully first-class user experience to the student but also take the dull logistic work out of the hands of the course providing professors and school (but see my blog post on the responsibilities MOOC providers could and should assume - http://tiny.cc/u8m1xw). In my perception then, Coursera cs best match the third kind in Justin's classification.
So the question is not so much whether Coursera cs will fail because of a lack of focus, but rather whether in the way we have organised our educational system there is room for such platforms. It seems to me that given the socio-political situation, in the USA there is whereas in continental Europe there isn't; or, put differently, that MOOCs will take a different form on both continents. The recent launch of a MOOC initiative by the European Association for Distance Teaching Universities (EADTU), backed by the European Commission, seems to support this view (http://tiny.cc/2en1xw). (@pbsloep) 
timokos's comment,
June 4, 5:05 AM
I agree that there is a completely different socio-political system in the USA and Europe, but I'm not sure if the OpunUpEd initiative will be able to compete with the reputation of the universities that have partnered with Coursera c.s. I wouldn't be surprised if Coursera tries the same strategy in Europe with lesser ranked universities (just as with their deal with the 9 State System Universities in the USA)
Peter B. Sloep's comment,
June 5, 7:29 AM
I am not sure about Coursera's business strategy. However, playing the elite university card has much more traction in the US and presumably many developing countries than it does in Europe, which has a more egalitarian educational system, France and the UK perhaps excepted.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
Scoop.it!
15 Mistakes You’re Probably Making With Technology In Learning
While it clearly is able to provide access to peers, audiences, resources, and data, it also can be awkward, problematic, distracting, performing more strongly as a barrier to understand than anything else. Why this happens also isn’t clear, but there are some common patterns and missteps to look for while designing or evaluating a learning process. Via Ana Cristina Pratas 
Trudy Sweeney's curator insight,
June 17, 11:30 PM
A great discussion starter! Thanks for sharing :-) 
Carmenne K. Thapliyal's curator insight,
June 18, 3:38 AM
An interesting list no doubt and discussion-provoking 
Steve Whitmore's curator insight,
June 18, 8:01 AM
It is always improtant to think about the purpose and the student's technological abilities. I see all too often with adult learning presenters overestimate the abilities of the learners. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
You have an expert Skype or Google Hangout into your classroom. Students discover a career they want to pursue. It’s not about the technology. It is about the learning. Your students are creating deep reflections in their blogs. It’s not about the technology. It is about the learning. Your students are using iPads to research the location from a novel. The information is shared on digital sticky notes using Linoit.com. It’s not about the technology. It is about the learning. Your students are collaboratively creating a group project using Google Presentations focused on the digestive system. It’s not about the technology. It is about the learning. Your students are making short video book reviews and creating QR codes and pasting the codes in the books to share. It’s not about the technology. It is about the learning....
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Beth Dichter's curator insight,
June 12, 10:29 PM
Are you considering implementing blended learning? If you are check out this new infographic from Digital Learning Now that looks at implementation process. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
The other big advantage of Scoop.it is that discussion is based around content, which can help to give the interaction more depth. It also helps user to escape much of the banality that appears on Twitter as it tends not to attract the celebrity or 'what I had for lunch' postings as it isn't principally about conversation, but as more of a focus on content sharing. Via Nik Peachey 
Jeffrey Earp's comment,
June 13, 4:15 AM
In a nutshell it's "look at this" vs. "look at me". And the spirits that drive the two are largely distinct, as this study (found on Scoop.it) attests http://mashable.com/2013/06/12/social-media-narcissism-study/. I know which spirits grab me!
Terheck's comment,
June 14, 4:23 PM
I use booth, by find more interesting content on Scoop.it than on Twitter.
Ursula O'Reilly Traynor's comment,
June 17, 2:49 AM
I love the way Scoopit links can be posted so easily on Twitter, thus driving traffic to our scooped content..I won't be giving up on Twitter and I also love Pinterest...each attract different groups of people who regularly come to visit us here at Scoop Towers.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
by Sean Michael Morris and Jesse Stommel
The point of any pedagogy is not the length of the course, size of the classroom, the headcount, or the completion or attrition rates. Pedagogy is unfazed by numbers; it is never outweighed by scale. Good pedagogy can be enacted in a room with one or two students, or in an online environment with thousands. This is because pedagogy is responsive, able to grow to the space it must inhabit, and its goal is a shift in thinking, which is spreadable by a single learner or by ten or by tens of hundreds. Via Hybrid Pedagogy Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
Curation tools and web services designed to create learning paths, curriculums, thematic collections and PKM portfolios Via Robin Good 
Raquel Oliveira's curator insight,
June 9, 9:50 PM
Need more time to taste all the tips, but at first, seems very useful ! Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
When edX first formed, its president Anant Agarwal emphasized that one of the core reasons driving the consortium’s initiative was research— the platform would be used to analyze and share results of new educational methods afforded by technology. Up until this point there has been little discussion about courses and/or results from the edX platform, Coursera and Udacity have dominated the headlines. Yet edX should be taking a different path given its not-for-profit premise. And this week we did [finally] get a glimpse into what appears to be extensive research going on behind the scenes. The Open Access journal, Research & Practice in Assessment released the paper Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom Research into edX’s First MOOC.
Insights:
Over 90% of the activity on discussion forums resulted from students just viewing /reading what others students had written—these students did not post, or comment or contribute in any way to discussions threads. Perhaps we need to change our way of thinking about how students use discussion forums, since students that do contribute can enhance and deepen learning and comprehension for students that don’t/or are unable to contribute. Though these silent students may be considered passive, this may not be the case, nor should they be considered lurkers. These students may very well be learning and making sense of course material on their own terms.
The demographics of the student body are notable. Over 155,000 students enrolled from over 194 countries, yet the the country that provided the largest percentage of students was the U.S. with 17% of the 155,000, followed by India at 8% of the total, the UK at just over 5%, followed by Columbia (4%) and Spain (2%). Only 622 students from China enrolled (less than 1%). These numbers suggest that language and culture are potential barriers to MOOC participation. The paper provides further details and data.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
Discover 30 useful (and free) eLearning tools and resources that can make your life easier!
We believe all eLearning professionals, especially those on a budget, should know of these tools and resources since their usage is quite common. Take a close look at each one and consider the possible uses in your eLearning projects... Via Dennis T OConnor 
Kristina Ayers Paul's curator insight,
June 13, 11:42 AM
My favorite part of this list is the section on free stock images. I'm always looking for resources for high-quality, royalty free photos to make my presentations pop. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
Hybrid Pedagogy is not just an academic journal, it is a journal of praxis. Rather than simply talk about pedagogy, we prefer to tamper with it and try it out on every conceivable scale. In the last year, Hybrid Pedagogy brought you the original MOOC MOOC, Twitter vs. Zombies, Digital Writing Month, and THATCamp Hybrid Pedagogy, all of which set the stage for our next experiment: the MOOCification MOOCathon. MOOCification is really a kind of pillaging. You take what works about MOOCs, the best pedagogy they open up, apply it to more traditional classes, and then politely (or not so politely) spit out the rest. Via Hybrid Pedagogy Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
When students lose sleep, their performance suffers.
Does that extra study time help performance in school?
This question was explored in a studying the January, 2013 issue of Child Development by Cari Gillen-O’Neel, Virginia Huynh, and Andrew Fuligni. They tracked a group of high school students in 9th, 10th, and 12th grade. At each grade level, students filled out a daily diary for 2 weeks.
Every evening during the study, the students rated the amount of sleep they got the day before, the amount of time they spent on homework, and they answered questions about any academic problems they had the previous day (like doing poorly on a test and having difficulty understanding new material).
Overall, there was a tendency for high school students to sleep less as they advanced in school. So, the 9th-grade-students slept an average of 7.6 hours a night, while the 12th-graders slept only 6.9 hours per night. Students experienced fewer academic problems as they advanced in school. That means that students are actually learning better school skills over the years.
The most important result, though, was that when students lost sleep because they spent extra time doing schoolwork, they had significantly more problems the next day than when they got their typical amount of sleep. This negative effect of extra study time was strongest for 12th-grade-students and weaker for the 9th- and 10th-grade students.
What does this mean?
First off, this study reinforces the general observation that teens and young adults are not sleeping enough. Getting even an extra 30 minutes of sleep a night would be a huge benefit for this group.
Second, it means that students need to try to spread their work out over longer periods of time. It is an age-old tradition to cram for exams and to finish papers at the last minute. There are lots of good reasons to want to avoid cramming. For example, cramming for an exam may help a student pass that particular exam, but information learned the night before the test is not remembered in the long-term as well as information that is studied over several nights. If cramming for a test also reduces the amount of sleep a student is getting, then that just adds to the problem. Via Heather Ramsey, Mark Deschaine, Ph.D. 
Heather Ramsey's curator insight,
May 2, 8:25 PM
For those of you who are "burning the candle at both ends" on a regular basis, this is the article for you. Learn why sleep is important for you to function properly in school.
Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
In a world of information overload, Is Organisational Learning about learning with the database?
There are lots of database out in “space” and organisation. They offer learning affordance and opportunities for us. But the learning actually won’t be “activated” unless you interact with them (artifacts, machines) and even human within organisation who are behind those database. If the argument that learning can reside outside of ourselves is true, what does it mean to individuals? The database “learnt” as we “teach” it through Q/A. However, would such be AI based on algorithms and or would it involve human intervention and recurrent updating of the database? Quora is a good example where it acts like a database, where people posts questions and responses there. How does it differ from individual human learning (cognitive & affective) and social learning, and organisation learning? Have we tried to blend all three levels (neuro and biological, cognitive (conceptual) and social) into the connective learning based on connections (George) (Connecting to (adding) nodes and growing the network (social/conceptual/biological), and network phenomena & recognition of such patterns (Stephen)? Via Ken Morrison 
Ken Morrison's curator insight,
June 4, 7:03 PM
I am sharing this blog becaue it offers an insightful point of view regarding how to activate knowledge that exists in databases, libraries, websites, etc. I really like his "ATM" analogy and his video "In Simple Language".
He talks about how the ATM can be 'outsmarted', but it is really a failure in programming, which can be upgraded. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Scoop.it!
From Web-enhanced face-to-face courses to MOOCs, flipped, blended, and fully online courses, videos are an integral component of today’s educational landscape—from kindergarten all the way through higher education.
But there’s a big difference between watching a video and learning something from it. Videos are great for presenting visual information and emotional appeals, but not particularly effective at diving below the surface of non-visual theoretical or abstract topics or for driving critical thinking. What’s more, any video presented in class must compete for attention and memory with the five-plus hours the typical student spends outside of class watching television programs, movies, and other onscreen entertainment. (Nielsen, 2013) Via Kathleen Cercone 
Jennifer Hoover's curator insight,
June 10, 2:24 PM
distance learning or learning through course videos can be very passive. As we move in this direction we need to be aware and careful of how to continue to engage our "virtual" students Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
