Friends at the End (FATE) a Member Society of the World Federation of Right To Die Societies. Their site offers information on the case for supporting legislation on Assisted Suicide.
Share ideas that matter on the social web and experience
the benefits of curating the world's best content.
I don't have a Facebook, a Twitter or a LinkedIn account
Your new post is loading...
Dignity in Dying's curator insight,
January 18, 8:45 AM
Retired Cardiologist and Dignity in Dying Supporter, Dr Chris Ward, has written a letter to the Independent, in which he suggests that the Liverpool Care Pathway has ‘come in for ill-informed criticism’
“Those who criticise the LCP in hysterical, apocalyptic terms demonstrate a lack of understanding of the working of palliative-care teams in general, and specifically of the LCP.”
You can read the full letter here: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/letters/letters-pathway-to-solace-in-death-8453029.html Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
Mariana Funes's comment,
April 12, 7:53 AM
Douglas Hall's insight:
The LCP is a starting-point; the beginnings of an alternative to avoidance & silence. The hint of a doctor unilaterally putting a patient on the LCP touches on a core implication of the current criminal status of assisting dying – the sensitivities of discussion and risk of repercussion generating avoidance. As illustrated, when relatives & family are given information, the ‘openness’ results in few/no problems. A spin-off example of sensitivities is the current publicity about how crematoria deal with the ashes of very young babies; I am sure the rationale behind the information given to grieving parents was well-meant, but a lack of openness – avoiding emotional realities – has had a detrimental effect on all. The LCP must be a move in the right direction. Careful monitoring will optimise learning, Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
Mariana Funes's comment,
April 3, 3:38 AM
From Michael Irwin (Retired GP)
Presently, Co-ordinator of the Society for Old Age Rational Suicide (SOARS) "In my opinion, the Liverpool Care Pathway is essentially the same as previous palliative care procedures which have progressively been given the following names - "Double Effect", "Terminal Sedation"; "Continous Deep Sedation". All of these procedures are basically a form of "slow euthanasia". Hopefully, the dying individual (if mentally competent) is consulted (and gives her/his approval) before the LCP begins: with the equally important involvement of close relatives."
Mariana Funes's comment,
April 3, 3:39 AM
From Liz Nichols, FATE council member after watching the documentary:
I wonder how many others have watched it and I too am interested in what others think. My emotions veered throughout but the closing statements that the LCP may be withdrawn altogether and the tone that many will die on it who didn't choose it, felt so wrong. It seemed clear largely that where information is given to relatives and patients directly about end of life choices/decisions there isn't a problem, and that the media is responsible for scaring people. Can it really be true that the system allows a single junior doctor to put a patient on the LCP without proper consultation with relatives, consultants etc.? it may have happened but I don't suppose it is what has been intended. ie the system is probably ok but needs closely monitoring. Delete the scoop?
Are you sure you want to delete this scoop?
Yes
|
veryVery very important topic.