October 2, 2012:
SERALINI'S GMO RAT STUDY AND SCIENCE: AN OPEN LETTER BY LEADING SCIENTISTS
The Seralini publication, and resultant media attention, raise the profile of fundamental challenges faced by science in a world increasingly dominated by corporate influence. These challenges are important for all of science but are rarely discussed in scientific venues. ....
STUDY IN QUESTION: NEW STUDY LINKS CHEMICALS USED ON CORN TO CANCER, THE LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH BY DISEASE IN U.S. CHILDREN http://www.scoop.it/t/agriculture-gmos-pesticides/p/2745332899/cancer-is-the-leading-cause-of-death-by-disease-in-us-children-as-new-study-links-chemicals-used-on-corn-to-the-disease
Treehugger, January 13, 2010
STUDY FINDS MONSANTO'S GMO CORN CAUSES ORGAN DAMAGE IN RODENTS http://www.treehugger.com/corporate-responsibility/study-finds-monsantos-gmo-corn-causes-organ-damage-in-rodents.html
November 25, 2012 - Nation of Change
IN BED WITH MONSANTO: Many Pro-GMO Corporate Biologists Own GMO Patents http://www.scoop.it/t/agriculture-gmos-pesticides/p/3472777250/in-bed-with-monsanto-many-pro-gmo-corporate-biologists-own-gmo-patents
NO SEEDS, NO INDEPENDENT RESEARCH - PATENT PREVENTION http://www.scoop.it/t/agriculture-gmos-pesticides/p/3087172079/no-seeds-no-independent-research-the-gmo-patent-game
NEW SERALINI WEBSITE
Scientific Research, Media Coverage, Cancer Petition http://sco.lt/4vkznV
-▶ SERALINI GMO PEER REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IS CRUSHED BY INDUSTRY
Journal retraction of Séralini study is illicit, unscientific, and unethical.
Hayes’ decision to retract the paper follows FCT’s appointment of Richard E. Goodman, a former Monsanto scientist and an affiliate of the GMO industry-funded group, the International Life Sciences Institute, to the specially created post of associate editor for biotechnology at the journal, early this year.
Goodman’s appointment in turn followed an orchestrated campaign by GMO supporters to persuade FCT to retract the study. Some critics even accused Prof Séralini of fraud, without presenting any evidence. Many of the critics had undeclared conflicts of interest with the GMO industry.
WHY IS THERE SO LITTLE INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEWED GMO RESEARCH? http://sco.lt/5jFagz